mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

WattGPU: Predicting Inference Power and Latency on Unseen GPUs and LLMs

arXiv 2607.02391 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.DC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption. Optimizing these deployments requires matching specific LLMs to the most efficient GPUs, but operators currently lack the tools to do so without exhaustively profiling each combination. While some predictive models exist, they still require profiling data and struggle to generalize to hardware unseen during training. To address this, we introduce textitWattGPU, featuring two predictive models for mean GPU power draw and Inter-Token Latency (ITL). Our approach leverages only publicly available LLM metadata and GPU specifications, eliminating the need for hardware access or profiling while enabling generalization to unseen NVIDIA server-grade GPUs and LLMs. We evaluate our models using rigorous leave-one-GPU-out and leave-one-LLM-out cross-validation on a dataset of 42 open-source LLMs (0.1B--27B parameters) and 8 GPUs under both offline and server scenarios. The mean power draw model achieves a median absolute percentage error of ≤3.4% for offline and ≤13.5% for server scenarios on unseen GPUs, while the latency model achieves ≤8.5% in server mode, both maintaining strong GPU ranking correlations for server scenarios (Kendall τ≥0.76). Compared to standard physically grounded baselines -- Load-Scaled Thermal Design Power (TDP) for power draw and roofline for latency -- our models reduce median absolute percentage error by approximately 4× on unseen LLM-GPU combinations for server scenarios or approximately 2× for completely unseen GPUs. WattGPU's data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/maufadel/wattgpu.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inferencecited by 168
  2. 2024Vidur: A Large-Scale Simulation Framework For LLM Inferencecited by 115
  3. 2025The ML.ENERGY Benchmark: Toward Automated Inference Energy Measurement and Optimizationcited by 31
  4. 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systemscited by 27
  5. 2025TokenPowerBench: Benchmarking the Power Consumption of LLM Inferencecited by 21
  6. 2024LLMCO2: Advancing Accurate Carbon Footprint Prediction for LLM Inferencescited by 19
  7. 2024SLO-aware GPU Frequency Scaling for Energy Efficient LLM Inference Servingcited by 18
  8. 2024MLPerf Power: Benchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Machine Learning Systems from Microwatts to Megawatts for Sustainable AIcited by 15
  9. 2025Quantifying the Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of LLM Inference via Simulationscited by 12
  10. 2025From Prompts to Power: Measuring the Energy Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 12
  11. 2025Forecasting LLM Inference Performance via Hardware-Agnostic Analytical Modelingcited by 7
  12. 2026Watt Counts: Energy-Aware Benchmark for Sustainable LLM Inference on Heterogeneous GPU Architecturescited by 5
2 more
  1. 2026This Is Taking Too Long -- Investigating Time as a Proxy for Energy Consumption of LLMscited by 3
  2. 2026The Energy Cost of Execution-Idle in GPU Clusterscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.