mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sequential Structure-Sensitive Residual Diagnostics for PDE Inverse Problems

arXiv 2607.02101 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026stat.ME stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational models in science and engineering are often assessed by checking whether the residual norm is consistent with the assumed noise level. This can be misleading in smoothing inverse problems: structured model errors may be attenuated in observation space, leaving residual magnitudes below practitioner discrepancy thresholds while coherent residual patterns remain. As a result, residual-norm diagnostics can accept fitted models that still give biased parameters, predictions, or quantities of interest. We propose a structure-sensitive sequential diagnostic based on e-processes. The method uses a portfolio of spatial residual-pattern experts, updates their likelihood-ratio wealth as observations are processed, and rejects the fitted model when the aggregate wealth crosses a prescribed threshold, giving anytime-valid type-I error control for a fixed fitted model. We compare the method with Morozov discrepancy checks, fixed-sample residual tests, and batch projection tests. Across three inverse problems (elliptic diffusion, two-dimensional Stokes flow, and a glaciological ice-stream inversion implemented in the community finite-element model icepack) we demonstrate how standard discrepancy checks accept misspecified fits that produce materially wrong quantities of interest. Structure-sensitive batch tests detect these failures using the full dataset, while the e-process detects them earlier from a fraction of the observations. After rejection, the expert wealth attributes the evidence to residual patterns in the chosen dictionary and provides a basis for exploratory model correction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

9 of 42 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018Time-uniform, nonparametric, nonasymptotic confidence sequencescited by 220
  2. 2022Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inferencecited by 145
  3. 2019Universal Inferencecited by 43
  4. 2021Tracking the risk of a deployed model and detecting harmful distribution shiftscited by 38
  5. 2022Beyond Neyman-Pearson: e-values enable hypothesis testing with a data-driven alphacited by 14
  6. 2025Instance-Log-Optimality of Portfolio-Based E-Processes and their Sequential Hypothesis Testscited by 10
  7. 2021Valid sequential inference on probability forecast performancecited by 7
  8. 2020The Anytime-Valid Logrank Test: Error Control Under Continuous Monitoring with Unlimited Horizoncited by 2
  9. 2014Adjoint accuracy for the full-Stokes ice flow model: limits to the transmission of basal friction variability to the surfacecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.