Lower Bounds for Anytime Acceleration of Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work suggests that the convergence rate of gradient descent (GD) in smooth convex optimization can be significantly improved by employing large stepsizes that may violate the descent property. In particular, if the total number of iterations n is given, an O(n-1.271) convergence rate can be achieved for both function value and squared gradient norm minimization. On the other hand, in the setting of anytime convergence, where n is not known in advance, the best known rates of GD are much slower: O(n-1.119) for function value minimization and O(n-1) for squared gradient norm minimization. It remains open whether any of these upper bounds can be improved, as they are far from the classical Omega(n-2) lower bound for any first-order method. In this work, we establish two lower bounds on the anytime convergence of GD. We show that no positive stepsize schedule can achieve an o(n-1.334) anytime rate for function value minimization, nor an o(n-1) anytime rate for squared gradient norm minimization. The key ingredients of our analysis are novel upper bounds on the number and the magnitude of large stepsizes, derived by analyzing GD on quadratic functions and variants of Huber functions. Our work provides the first lower bounds for the COLT 2024 open problem posed by Kornowski and Shamir regarding the optimal anytime convergence rates of GD.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Silver Rate Is (Almost) Optimal for Gradient Descent8 Sep 2026
- 2026Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov2 Sep 2026
- 2026A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descent11 Aug 2026