Single-Channel EEG-Based Cognitive Load Assessment in Online Learning: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Monitoring cognitive load during online learning could help instructors identify content that learners find difficult, but remote settings remove the visual cues that support this judgement in a classroom. We study whether a single-channel, consumer-grade EEG device (the NeuroSky MindWave Mobile 2) can distinguish easy from difficult educational-video content, using the publicly available dataset of Wang et al. [24] (ten learners, one excluded for excessive noise, leaving nine). We implement a hybrid CNN+LSTM+Attention model that combines the raw waveform with band-power features. In a within-subject setting, the model reaches up to 78.5% accuracy, compared with 55% for conventional feature-based classifiers; regularization (dropout and L2) closes the large gap between training and validation accuracy that we observe without it, keeping validation accuracy stable at roughly 68-73%. We are deliberately cautious about these numbers: with only nine subjects, within-subject evaluation is optimistic, and we argue that subject-independent evaluation -- in which no learner appears in both training and test data -- should be the standard for this task. To that end we release a reproducible evaluation pipeline. We frame the work as a feasibility study rather than a deployable system, and pair it with an open, notebook-based tool that records EEG, runs inference, and visualizes estimated cognitive load as a heatmap over the video timeline to help educators locate potentially challenging segments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
6 of 26 references.
References · 6
- 2020Machine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Reviewcited by 32
- 2019Classification of Hand Movements from EEG using a Deep Attention-based LSTM Networkcited by 12
- 2026An Empirical Analysis of Community and Coding Patterns in OSS4SG vs. Conventional OSScited by 3
- 2025Reverse Engineering User Stories from Code using Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Do Good, Stay Longer? Temporal Patterns and Predictors of Newcomer-to-Core Transitions in Conventional OSS and OSS4SGcited by 1
- 2026Same Project, Different Start: How Contribution Events Shape Activity and Retention in Open Sourcecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.