PACE: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Plausible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations explain machine learning predictions by identifying minimal input changes that would alter a model's decision. Although many existing methods successfully generate prediction-changing alternatives, they often produce unrealistic or infeasible recommendations due to a lack of explicit mechanisms for incorporating domain knowledge and intervention constraints. Neuro-symbolic AI offers a promising direction by combining data-driven predictive models with symbolic reasoning capable of representing human-understandable rules and feasible actions. This paper presents PACE, a modular neuro-symbolic framework for generating feasibility-aware counterfactual explanations. The framework separates prediction and reasoning into two components: a neural predictive model for classification and a symbolic reasoning layer that enforces domain-specific constraints during counterfactual generation. By explicitly modeling feasible interventions, the framework produces explanations consistent with domain knowledge while remaining interpretable and actionable. The approach is model-agnostic and adaptable to domains requiring realistic decision support. A case study is conducted on the Adult Income dataset, combining a multilayer perceptron classifier with Answer Set Programming (ASP) rules encoding feasible modifications to education, occupation, and working hours while preserving immutable attributes. Results highlight the trade-off between counterfactual validity and plausibility and show that symbolic constraints yield explanations that better satisfy domain-specific feasibility requirements, illustrating the potential of neuro-symbolic methods for transparent, feasibility-aware counterfactual explanation in explainable AI.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 13 references.
References · 8
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
- 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
- 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 144
- 2022VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generationcited by 20
- 2021Answer-Set Programs for Reasoning about Counterfactual Interventions and Responsibility Scores for Classificationcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Think before You Simulate: Symbolic Reasoning to Orchestrate Neural Computation for Counterfactual Question Answering
- 2025LeapFactual: Reliable Visual Counterfactual Explanation Using Conditional Flow Matching
- 2026The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning
- 2025Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergence
- 2026Prompt-Counterfactual Explanations for Generative AI System Behavior
- 2025Executable Counterfactuals: Improving LLMs' Causal Reasoning Through Code
- 2026Neuro-symbolic PRM: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning via Structured Traces and Symbolic Verification
- 2023Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning Shortcuts: Mitigation Strategies and their Limitations