Faithful by Definition: Emotion Analysis via Natural Semantic Metalanguage Explications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explanations for emotion classifiers are usually produced post hoc, with no guarantee that they reflect the computation behind the label. We present an explication interface for event-based emotion analysis. A parser maps the input text to an explication, a short script in the closed vocabulary of Natural Semantic Metalanguage organized into twelve typed slots, and a fixed decision list of rules transcribed from published semantic definitions computes the label from the explication alone. The faithfulness guarantee is therefore causal and definitional, while all empirical risk lives in the learned parser, which the per-line entailment interface makes auditable against the input. On crowd-sourced event descriptions, our fine-tuned parser reaches 0.33 accuracy and 0.48 selective accuracy on a small held-out set, suggesting that the interface trades insignificant accuracy difference to a black-box model for a verifiable, inspectable decision basis for first-person event-based emotion analysis. We also release EmoExpl-1200 with per-line verification metadata and the full rule set.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 43 references.
References · 17
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 143
- 2024FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"cited by 86
- 2022Dimensional Modeling of Emotions in Text with Appraisal Theories: Corpus Creation, Annotation Reliability, and Predictioncited by 46
- 2025Walk the Talk? Measuring the Faithfulness of Large Language Model Explanationscited by 45
- 2024FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answeringcited by 39
- 2024To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contextscited by 25
- 2025MetaFaith: Faithful Natural Language Uncertainty Expression in LLMscited by 16
- 2020Joint Modelling of Emotion and Abusive Language Detectioncited by 13
- 2025Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanationscited by 10
5 more
- 2025Verbosity Tradeoffs and the Impact of Scale on the Faithfulness of LLM Self-Explanationscited by 7
- 2025Aligning Large Language Models for Faithful Integrity Against Opposing Argumentcited by 6
- 2026Breaking the Chain: A Causal Analysis of LLM Faithfulness to Intermediate Structurescited by 6
- 2025Towards Interpretability Without Sacrifice: Faithful Dense Layer Decomposition with Mixture of Decoderscited by 5
- 2026Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models:A Survey of Design Principles and Architecturescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.