mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prototype Language Models

arXiv 2607.00510 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowing which training examples drive outputs is fundamental to auditing, correcting, and understanding language models, yet for modern LLMs this remains expensive, approximate, and largely post-hoc. Standard language models generate tokens through a dense network pathway, causing training data's influence to be distributed across parameters rather than organized along explicit, traceable components. We introduce a prototype language model architecture, Prototypes for Interpretable Sequence Modeling (PRISM), that forms each prediction via a sparse, non-negative mixture of learned prototypes, trained with clustering objectives that anchor each prototype to coherent neighborhoods of training examples. Across architectures from 130M to 1.6B parameters trained on up to 50B tokens, prototype language models either surpass or remain within 2.5 percentage points on average downstream accuracy of matched dense baselines. We show that sparse prototype structure localizes curvature in the loss landscape, yielding a more tractable Hessian and enabling training data attribution that is ~500x faster than post hoc baselines when consuming equivalent memory. Calibrating linear prototype controllers can improve downstream accuracy by roughly 3 points while tracing those corrections back to training neighborhoods, and targeted prototype suppression can remove model behaviors without finetuning or measurable loss in generation quality.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

Builds on

21 of 101 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  2. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
  3. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
  4. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
  5. 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
  6. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 132
  7. 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 101
  8. 2024Gradient Routing: Masking Gradients to Localize Computation in Neural Networkscited by 34
  9. 2025MAGIC: Near-Optimal Data Attribution for Deep Learningcited by 22
  10. 2025FlexOlmo: Open Language Models for Flexible Data Usecited by 15
  11. 2024This Looks Better than That: Better Interpretable Models with ProtoPNeXtcited by 11
  12. 2025Beyond Data Filtering: Knowledge Localization for Capability Removal in LLMscited by 11
9 more
  1. 2024Revisiting inverse Hessian vector products for calculating influence functionscited by 10
  2. 2025Large-Scale Training Data Attribution for Music Generative Models via Unlearningcited by 9
  3. 2024Generalized Group Data Attributioncited by 6
  4. 2024Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based Methodscited by 5
  5. 2026Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agentscited by 4
  6. 2024Interpretable Next-token Prediction via the Generalized Induction Headcited by 3
  7. 2026LoRIF: Low-Rank Influence Functions for Scalable Training Data Attributioncited by 3
  8. 2025Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language Modelscited by 2
  9. 2026Natively Unlearnable Large Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.