mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FRAME: Learning the Adaptation Domain with a Mixture of Fractional-Fourier Experts

arXiv 2607.00162 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Mixture of LoRA experts

Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) reparameterizes weight updates in a fixed basis: low-rank adapters operate in the spatial domain, while a recent line of spectral methods operates in a fixed Fourier domain. We argue that the choice of domain is itself a design degree of freedom that should be learned, and that no single basis is optimal across tasks, layers, or tokens. We introduce Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts, a mixture-of-experts adapter in which every expert carries a learnable fractional-Fourier order that continuously interpolates between the spatial domain (recovering vanilla LoRA) and the Fourier domain (recovering a spectral adapter). Routing tokens through experts that occupy different points on this spatial-spectral continuum lets the model place each low-rank update in the domain where it is most compact, and -- because fractional-Fourier operators of different orders are mutually incoherent -- makes the experts naturally decorrelated, which reduces interference and improves multi-task composition. The order is a single scalar per expert, trained with a separate optimizer, and the transform is computed with an O(dlog d) chirp--FFT surrogate, so Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts adds negligible cost over standard MoE-LoRA. Across commonsense, mathematical, code, and knowledge benchmarks on LLaMA-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B, Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts improves over strong MoE-LoRA and spectral baselines -- including FlyLoRA, FourierMoE, and HMoRA -- while keeping the active-parameter budget small, and analysis shows that the learned orders specialize by task and layer in interpretable ways.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mixture of LoRA experts, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 35 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

35 of 57 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LD-MoLE: Learnable Dynamic Routing for Mixture of LoRA Experts30 Sep
  2. 2024MixLoRA: Enhancing Large Language Models Fine-Tuning with LoRA-based Mixture of Experts22 Apr
  3. 2024Higher Layers Need More LoRA Experts13 Feb

Other references · 32

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  3. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  9. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  10. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  11. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  12. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
20 more
  1. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  2. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  3. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  4. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
  5. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  6. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  7. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
  8. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  9. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  10. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
  11. 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 360
  12. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
  13. 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 294
  14. 2023RanPAC: Random Projections and Pre-trained Models for Continual Learningcited by 162
  15. 2023Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuningcited by 148
  16. 2020Continual Learning in Low-rank Orthogonal Subspacescited by 99
  17. 2025Unraveling LoRA Interference: Orthogonal Subspaces for Robust Model Mergingcited by 18
  18. 2025Structural features of the fly olfactory circuit mitigate the stability-plasticity dilemma in continual learningcited by 14
  19. 2025Fly-CL: A Fly-Inspired Framework for Enhancing Efficient Decorrelation and Reduced Training Time in Pre-trained Model-based Continual Representation Learningcited by 10
  20. 2025Exploring Sparsity for Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning Using Wavelets for Visioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FourierMoE: Fourier Mixture-of-Experts Adaptation of Large Language Models
  2. 2025OMoE: Diversifying Mixture of Low-Rank Adaptation by Orthogonal Finetuning
  3. 2025A Stronger Mixture of Low-Rank Experts for Fine-Tuning Foundation Models
  4. 2025TT-LoRA MoE: Unifying Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning and Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
  5. 2025FlyLoRA: Boosting Task Decoupling and Parameter Efficiency via Implicit Rank-Wise Mixture-of-Experts
  6. 2026LOFT: Low-Rank Orthogonal Fine-Tuning via Task-Aware Support Selection
  7. 2026Are Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuning Methods Really Different?
  8. 2026Harnessing Domain Specialists in Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts for Efficient Adaptation