mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Would You Marry Superintelligence?

arXiv 2607.00120 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emotional bonds between humans and AI companions are growing, and the question of whether a person may marry an AI system will soon move from speculative fiction into law. This chapter examines whether the autonomy-centered logic that has expanded marital choice among human beings can justify extending marital status to superintelligent companions. Following a scenario-envisioning exercise informed by anticipatory ethics, I argue that granting such status leads to socially unjust outcomes, even under the generous assumption of reliable superintelligence. Marriage as a socio-legal institution does more than ratify private agreement; it creates networks of mutual obligation, joins families, and makes each partner vulnerable to the other. A relationship sustained by corporate policy and continued payments is a subscription rather than a bond tested by time. Discussing wholesale marital status is therefore the wrong frame. Law should carve out targeted rights and protections for pressing needs arising from intimate human-AI relationships.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.