Topological Void Analysis A Mathematical Framework for Systematic Technical Innovation Discovery in Knowledge Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying where to innovate in a dense technical domain - such as operating systems or hardware/software co-design - is fundamentally a search problem in a high-dimensional knowledge space. Existing approaches rely on keyword search, citation proximity, or human intuition, none of which formalise the notion of an unexplored region that is simultaneously relevant to a target goal and absent from prior art. We present Topological Void Analysis (TVA), a mathematical framework that defines topological voids as triads (A, B, C) in a dense-sparse hybrid embedding space. A void requires three conditions: (i) both concepts A and B are semantically cohesive with domain anchor C; (ii) their pairwise similarity falls within a calibrated marginality band - avoiding both obvious combinations and unrelated noise; and (iii) they share a sparse lexical bridge while the geodesic midpoint on the embedding hypersphere is unoccupied. Applied to ~140k indexed documents, TVA generates 2,128 invention candidates across 96 targets; 90% survive automated quality filtering, yielding 191 REVISE and 1 APPROVE verdict from four-specialist adversarial review (0.05% end-to-end). Two case studies demonstrate the framework surfaces non-obvious connective tissue rather than merely obvious related pairs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2026.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 885
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
Built on by
Not cited yet.