Review Residuals: Update-Conditioned Residual Gating for Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Residual connections add every sublayer's proposed update with a fixed coefficient of one; the network never evaluates whether an update is reliable before committing it. Drawing on the human-factors principle of independent verification, we introduce Review Residuals, which scale each update by a learned, input-dependent gate conditioned on both the current state and the proposed update: h_l = h_{l-1} + r_l * u_l with r_l = sigmoid(W[RMSNorm(h_{l-1}), RMSNorm(u_l)]). Conditioning the gate on the update is the property that distinguishes it from prior gated and scaled residuals. We report two findings. First, a depth-stability result: a convex (Highway-style) form of the gate reintroduces vanishing gradients and fails to train beyond ~20 layers, whereas the additive, identity-preserving form trains stably at all depths we tested. Second, an emergence-with-scale result: trained from scratch across five sizes (60M-1B parameters, multi-seed), Review Residuals show no advantage at small scale but at 590M significantly outperform both a parameter-matched Highway gate and a parameter-matched standard residual (p<0.05), with a larger advantage at 1B. The benefit grows with model size rather than shrinking.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 19 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 922
- 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 178
- 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 168
- 2026Attention Residualscited by 65
Built on by
Not cited yet.