mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CORTEX: Token-Level Hallucination Detection in RAG via Comparative Internal Representations

arXiv 2606.31033 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Hallucination detection in RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose CORTEX, a token-level hallucination detection method for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). In long-form RAG outputs, hallucinations often arise in localized spans rather than throughout an entire response. CORTEX therefore identifies ungrounded content at the token level, enabling fine-grained localization of hallucinations. The key intuition behind CORTEX is that tokens grounded in retrieved documents should be more strongly influenced by those documents than hallucinated tokens. To capture this document-induced effect, CORTEX compares internal representations of a large language model (LLM) under two conditions: with and without the retrieved documents. Instead of relying solely on each token's immediate sensitivity to the retrieved documents, CORTEX also leverages the propagation of document-grounded information through preceding tokens, reducing false positives for tokens whose evidence has already been absorbed into the context. Finally, CORTEX applies post-processing smoothing step that models the tendency of hallucination labels to persist over contiguous spans, reducing local noise and encouraging span-consistent predictions. Experiments on two RAG benchmarks and three LLMs show that CORTEX substantially improves token-level hallucination detection, with each component consistently contributing to performance gains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination detection in RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models31 Dec

Other references · 11

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
  4. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
  5. 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 88
  6. 2025ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 31
  7. 2025Attention-guided Self-reflection for Zero-shot Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 16
  8. 2024Zero-shot Persuasive Chatbots with LLM-Generated Strategies and Information Retrievalcited by 14
  9. 2024The HalluRAG Dataset: Detecting Closed-Domain Hallucinations in RAG Applications Using an LLM's Internal Statescited by 8
  10. 2026HalluHard: A Hard Multi-Turn Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 7
  11. 2026Rethinking Hallucinations: Correctness, Consistency, and Prompt Multiplicitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RAGognizer: Hallucination-Aware Fine-Tuning via Detection Head Integration
  2. 2025LUMINA: Detecting Hallucinations in RAG System with Context-Knowledge Signals
  3. 2025TPA: Next Token Probability Attribution for Detecting Hallucinations in RAG
  4. 2026Beyond Document Grounding: Span-Level Hallucination Detection over Code, Tool Output, and Documents
  5. 2025InterpDetect: Interpretable Signals for Detecting Hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  6. 2025The Semantic Illusion: Certified Limits of Embedding-Based Hallucination Detection in RAG Systems
  7. 2025Probabilistic distances-based hallucination detection in LLMs with RAG
  8. 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretability