mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Accelerometry-Derived Digital Biomarkers for Cardiometabolic Risk: A Population-Representative Tabular Benchmark with Uncertainty Quantification

arXiv 2606.30702 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Structured tabular data dominates clinical medicine, yet existing benchmarks fail to reflect real-world properties like complex survey sampling, demographic oversampling, and subgroup fairness. We introduce the NHANES Accelerometry Cardiometabolic Benchmark, derived from NHANES 2003-2006, comprising 1,381 adults with hip-worn accelerometry, fasting laboratory biomarkers, dietary intake, and anthropometrics. We evaluate three tabular learning methods -- ridge regression, XGBoost, and the foundation model TabPFN v2 -- to predict glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting triglycerides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) from activity phenotypes and lifestyle covariates. TabPFN v2 achieves the best overall performance (HbA1c R^2=0.156, CRP R^2=0.383), while triglycerides remain largely unpredictable (R^2 < 0.05), consistent with known genetic dominance. We apply split conformal prediction to generate distribution-free 90% prediction intervals and evaluate demographic coverage equity across sex and race/ethnicity subgroups. Marginal coverage aligns with the 90% target for CRP and HbA1c but falls below for triglycerides. At the subgroup level, we observe localized undercoverage (e.g., HbA1c for Mexican American participants), illustrating the gap between marginal guarantees and the conditional coverage required for clinical fairness. Code and data are at https://github.com/felizzi/nhanes-accel-cardiometabolic-benchmark.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.

Builds on

6 of 11 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  3. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  4. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
  5. 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 211
  6. 2025Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.