SADL: What to Ignore? A Benchmark for Subject-Aware Distractor Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Photographs frequently contain visual distractors besides foregrounds and backgrounds of the intended subject, competing for attention and weakening composition. While modern editing tools streamline object removal, identifying which objects to remove remains a mostly manual process. Existing saliency models and open-vocabulary detectors operate without subject awareness, failing to adapt to shifting user intent. Furthermore, context-agnostic removal may disrupt the scene's semantic coherence (e.g., keep the person but remove the chair they are sitting on). To address these limitations, we formalize the task of subject-aware distractor localization, which identifies distractors while retaining compositionally essential objects. This paper introduces textscSADL, the first real-world benchmark for this task, comprising 1,800 subject-aware cases across 1,000 photographs to enable systematic evaluation and facilitate future research. In total, there are 14,617 annotated candidates, including a robust set of 1,938 hard negatives to stress-test exclusion calibration. We evaluate seven proprietary and open-weight Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on a sequential pipeline of distractor classification followed by exclusion filtering, structured around five inclusion factors and three contextual exclusion rules. Our analysis reveals that VLMs are highly capable of identifying distractors, but then over-apply exclusion, which systematically suppresses true distractors at scale. By exposing this critical bottleneck, textscSADL provides a foundational diagnostic tool to advance subject-conditioned reasoning in multimodal systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
6 of 35 references.
References · 6
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
- 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,611
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2023PerceptionCLIP: Visual Classification by Inferring and Conditioning on Contextscited by 17
- 2025Math Blind: Failures in Diagram Understanding Undermine Reasoning in MLLMscited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Focus-then-Context: Subject-Centric Progressive Visual Token Reduction for Vision-Language Models
- 2025EraseLoRA: MLLM-Driven Foreground Exclusion and Background Subtype Aggregation for Dataset-Free Object Removal
- 2026RECOUNT: Reference-guided Counting with Synthetic Visual Exemplars
- 2026SSMNBench: Diagnosing Image-based Cross-View Human-Object Understanding via Single-View Sufficiency and Multi-View Necessity
- 2026DistractMIA: Black-Box Membership Inference on Vision-Language Models via Semantic Distraction
- 2026MoGround: Measuring and Mitigating Modality Distraction in Vision-Language Models
- 2025HiDe: Rethinking The Zoom-IN method in High Resolution MLLMs via Hierarchical Decoupling
- 2026ActiveScope: Actively Seeking and Correcting Perception for MLLMs