Online Data Selection for Instruction Tuning via Gaussian Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training and fine-tuning shifting its focus from data volume to data quality, quality data selection has emerged as a critical research topic. Existing online data selection methods for LLM training are typically "batch-constrained", limiting optimization to local utility within random batches. To overcome this, we propose GAIA (Global Adaptive Instruction tuning via GAussian processes), a framework that formulates data valuation as a global estimation process. GAIA employs Gaussian Process regression to model continuous utility manifolds across the semantic space, utilizing an adaptive strategy fusion mechanism to dynamically prioritize high-utility samples. By casting the strategy-posterior update as an instance of the classical fixed-share Hedge framework for tracking the best expert, we inherit a dynamic-regret guarantee that characterizes GAIA's robustness under non-stationary quality scores during training. Empirical evaluations on three datasets demonstrate that GAIA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines like greats, establishing our method as a scalable and robust solution for efficient instruction tuning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
31 of 42 references.
References · 31
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
19 more
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2018Dataset Distillationcited by 230
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
- 2023Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 148
- 2015Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networkscited by 122
- 2025MedReason: Eliciting Factual Medical Reasoning Steps in LLMs via Knowledge Graphscited by 110
- 2024What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functionscited by 94
- 2023LAVA: Data Valuation without Pre-Specified Learning Algorithmscited by 69
- 2024Rethinking Data Shapley for Data Selection Tasks: Misleads and Meritscited by 29
- 2021Tighter Bounds on the Log Marginal Likelihood of Gaussian Process Regression Using Conjugate Gradientscited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.