Smooth Scaling Laws Hide Stepwise Token Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language model loss follows remarkably regular scaling laws over model and data size, yet it remains unclear why the aggregate loss should exhibit a power-law form. Existing explanations often attribute this regularity to a heavy-tailed spectrum of pattern difficulty in natural language, but this view has not been directly validated at token-level granularity in large-scale real-data training. We present a token-level framework that decomposes scaling laws into localized learning events of individual contextualized tokens. By fitting token loss trajectories with sigmoids, we show that token learning is concentrated in localized transitions, giving rise to a learning-time spectrum that dominates the scaling-law shape. Across more than one hundred pre-training runs on large and diverse real-language corpora with modern LLM architectures, scaling up to 6B parameters and 300B training tokens, the measured learning-time spectrum quantitatively reconstructs the validation loss derivative along the training-step T, data-scale D, and model-scale M axes. We further show that the same signal is actionable: by reshaping the training distribution according to when tokens become learnable, we alter the optimization trajectory and achieve 11% faster validation-loss reduction. These results provide direct empirical evidence that scaling laws are governed primarily by the distribution of token-level learning times, and that this distribution can be used not only to explain scaling behavior but also to improve training performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2026.
Builds on
36 of 41 references.
References · 36
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 202
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
- 2023Skill-it! A Data-Driven Skills Framework for Understanding and Training Language Modelscited by 121
24 more
- 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 116
- 2024Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream taskscited by 113
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 111
- 2020When Do You Need Billions of Words of Pretraining Data?cited by 104
- 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 88
- 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structurescited by 83
- 2022Training Trajectories of Language Models Across Scalescited by 81
- 2023Efficient Online Data Mixing For Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 77
- 2024Frequency Explains the Inverse Correlation of Large Language Models' Size, Training Data Amount, and Surprisal's Fit to Reading Timescited by 39
- 2023Characterizing Learning Curves During Language Model Pre-Training: Learning, Forgetting, and Stabilitycited by 35
- 2025Physics of Language Models: Part 4.1, Architecture Design and the Magic of Canon Layerscited by 33
- 2024A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimationcited by 27
- 2025Beyond Random Sampling: Efficient Language Model Pretraining via Curriculum Learningcited by 26
- 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 23
- 2024An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws in the multitask sparse parity problemcited by 22
- 2024Curriculum Learning for Small Code Language Modelscited by 22
- 2025A Multi-Power Law for Loss Curve Prediction Across Learning Rate Schedulescited by 22
- 2025Learning curves theory for hierarchically compositional data with power-law distributed featurescited by 17
- 2025Functional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate Schedulescited by 17
- 2025Learning In-context n-grams with Transformers: Sub-n-grams Are Near-stationary Pointscited by 16
- 2024Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distributioncited by 15
- 2026On the origin of neural scaling laws: from random graphs to natural languagecited by 14
- 2025Language Model Behavioral Phases are Consistent Across Architecture, Training Data, and Scalecited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.