AURORA: Asymmetry and Update-Induced Rotation for Robust Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing tasks. However, their tendency to generate hallucinations, namely factually incorrect or unfaithful outputs, poses a critical obstacle to their deployment in high-stakes applications. Although recent hallucination detection methods have made encouraging progress, they typically rely on costly output-level consistency checks or static hidden-state probes that capture shallow dataset-specific patterns, leading to substantial degradation under cross-dataset evaluation. In this work, we propose AURORA, a novel hallucination detection framework that shifts the focus from static representations to the weight-gradient dynamics of LLMs. Our key insight is that hallucinated and faithful answers induce qualitatively different gradient update patterns on the model's parameters. Specifically, hallucinated samples trigger asymmetric and structurally misaligned gradients, which can be captured through two complementary features: (1) the skewness of the cosine similarity distribution between weight matrices and their gradient update directions, and (2) the rotation ratio, which quantifies how much the gradient update reorients the singular-vector basis of weight matrices via SVD. AURORA achieves strong hallucination detection performance across four model families and four benchmark datasets. Further analyses demonstrate that our method scales effectively across model sizes and transfers to out-of-domain tasks, including mathematical reasoning and vision-language scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 15 references.
References · 10
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 159
- 2024InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Answerscited by 26
- 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoningcited by 13
- 2025HARP: Hallucination Detection via Reasoning Subspace Projectioncited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026BEACON: Behavioral Entropy Aggregation for Cross-Model Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
- 2026Scalable Token-Level Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
- 2026Lyapunov Probes for Hallucination Detection in Large Foundation Models
- 2026Predictive Coding and Information Bottleneck for Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
- 2026Domain-Specific Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
- 2023SAC3: Reliable Hallucination Detection in Black-Box Language Models via Semantic-aware Cross-check Consistency
- 2025D2HScore: Reasoning-Aware Hallucination Detection via Semantic Breadth and Depth Analysis in LLMs
- 2025Verify when Uncertain: Beyond Self-Consistency in Black Box Hallucination Detection