mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization

arXiv 2606.29521 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning problems rarely involve objectives that are equal in importance. A primary objective defines the goal, whilst secondary objectives, such as sparsity, compression, or robustness constrain the solution. While existing multi-objective methods have proven effective in practice, they have a clear symmetry problem and neglect the inherent objective hierarchy built into these objective spaces. We introduce Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based optimization framework designed to explicitly exploit hierarchical objective structures. PCD preserves the direction of primary descent whilst allowing for the minimal distortion necessary to guarantee progress on secondary objectives, controlled by a single τ ∈ [0, 1] that dictates the strength of the distortion. The resulting formulation is invariant to objective scaling and admits exact closed-form solutions for problems with two and three objectives. We evaluate PCD within structured network compression settings, unstructured sparsity and low-rankness, and across a variety of synthetic experiments, showing Pareto dominance and better per-objective performance with secondary progress guarantees over existing methods, further exhibiting the interpretable trade-off that τ provides.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  4. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  6. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  7. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  8. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
  9. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  10. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  11. 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 459
  12. 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 292
12 more
  1. 2017Empirical Analysis of the Hessian of Over-Parametrized Neural Networkscited by 290
  2. 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 215
  3. 2020Learning the Pareto Front with Hypernetworkscited by 125
  4. 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
  5. 2023FAMO: Fast Adaptive Multitask Optimizationcited by 78
  6. 2023Independent Component Alignment for Multi-Task Learningcited by 70
  7. 2022Do Current Multi-Task Optimization Methods in Deep Learning Even Help?cited by 60
  8. 2023Auxiliary Learning as an Asymmetric Bargaining Gamecited by 12
  9. 2025Cooper: A Library for Constrained Optimization in Deep Learningcited by 11
  10. 2024PMGDA: A Preference-based Multiple Gradient Descent Algorithmcited by 10
  11. 2025Neural Network Quantization for Microcontrollers: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Platforms, and Applicationscited by 7
  12. 2021Exact Pareto Optimal Search for Multi-Task Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Makingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.