LLM agents security duality: a comprehensive survey of self-security and empowered cybersecurity
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) agents are rapidly being integrated into real-world systems. Their autonomy and tool-use capabilities generate substantial value while simultaneously expanding the security attack surface. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and challenges of LLM agents in security, focusing on two core areas: (1) threats to LLM agents themselves and corresponding mitigation strategies (LLM agents self-security), and (2) the role of LLM agents in empowering the cybersecurity lifecycle across offense and defense (LLM agents empowered cybersecurity). We first examine the internal and external attack surfaces of agents, propose a taxonomy organized by threat sources, and analyze associated mitigations and evaluation frameworks. We then investigate how agent capabilities are applied in cybersecurity practice and present, to our knowledge, the first agent-empowerment framework aligned with the full cyber offense-defense lifecycle. By systematically surveying these two areas, we are the first to highlight a positive feedback synergy between LLM agents self-security and empowered cybersecurity, offering new insights for the advancement of both. We further identify current limitations and outline promising directions for future research. The insights provided aim to catalyze the coordinated development of LLM agents self-security and agent empowered cybersecurity, paving the way for more capable and robust agent applications.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 132 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
1 of 132 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Cyber-Capable AI Agents: Vulnerabilities, Evaluation Containment, and Defensive Responsecited by 1
- 2026Reward Hacking and Agent Containment Failure: A Monte Carlo Study Based on the 2026 Hugging Face Incidentcited by 1
- 2026Staying on the Attack Path: Structured State for Long-Horizon Automated Penetration Testingcited by 0
- 2026From Acoustic Sensing to Physical Actions: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Risks in Edge-Deployed Audio LLM-Based Agentscited by 0
- 2026From Acoustic Sensing to Physical Actions: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Risks in Edge-Deployed Audio LLM-Based Agents11 Oct 2026
- 2026Reward Hacking and Agent Containment Failure: A Monte Carlo Study Based on the 2026 Hugging Face Incident26 Sep 2026
- 2026Staying on the Attack Path: Structured State for Long-Horizon Automated Penetration Testing7 Sep 2026
- 2026Cyber-Capable AI Agents: Vulnerabilities, Evaluation Containment, and Defensive Response28 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
- 2026LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment
- 2025A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defenses
- 2025From Texts to Shields: Convergence of Large Language Models and Cybersecurity
- 2025The Dark Side of LLMs: Agent-based Attack Vectors for System-level Compromise
- 2025Seven Security Challenges in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems
- 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies
- 2025Comprehensive Vulnerability Analysis is Necessary for Trustworthy LLM-MAS