Agent-Native Immune System: Architecture, Taxonomy, and Engineering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The transition from static chat bots to autonomous agents--equipped with persistent memory, tool-use protocols, and multi-agent collaboration--has fundamentally expanded the AI threat landscape. Current defense mechanisms, such as perimeter security and training-time alignment, remain external to the agent's active reasoning loop. Consequently, they fall short: a fully aligned agent remains highly vulnerable to runtime hijacking via memory poisoning, tool-chain manipulation, or multi-agent protocol attacks. To address this critical gap, we introduce the Agent-Native Immune System (ANIS), the first biologically inspired, endogenous defense architecture embedded directly within the agent's cognitive loop. Our framework presents four primary contributions. First, we design a six-layer Immune Tower (L0-L5), distinctly incorporating Barrier Immunity (L1) as a non-cognitive, physical-and-logical isolation layer. Second, we establish a unified taxonomy of Agent Viruses and Agent Vaccines, formalizing the critical distinction between superficial non-parametric defenses and robust parametric vaccines. Third, we conceptualize the Harness Triad--Meta, Self, and Auto--a self-monitoring, meta-cognitive automation backbone that drives Continual Immune Learning (CIL), enabling vaccines to dynamically adapt to novel threats. Finally, we establish a rigorous theoretical demarcation between model alignment and agent immunity: while alignment provides a static "constitutional" value foundation during training, ANIS serves as the dynamic "law enforcement" mechanism during runtime. We conclude by framing open challenges for the field, including immune protocol standardization, novel evaluation metrics such as the Autoimmunity Rate (false-positive intervention rate), and the co-evolutionary dynamics between pathogens and vaccines within collective intelligence ecosystems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 309
- 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
- 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agentscited by 158
- 2026Self-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselvescited by 107
- 2026AutoHarness: improving LLM agents by automatically synthesizing a code harnesscited by 76
- 2025Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agentscited by 71
- 2026Lying with Truths: Open-Channel Multi-Agent Collusion for Belief Manipulation via Generative Montagecited by 19
- 2025Amplified Vulnerabilities: Structured Jailbreak Attacks on LLM-based Multi-Agent Debatecited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentAntibody: An Adaptive Immune System for Defending LLM Agents against Prompt Injection
- 2026AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents
- 2026Beyond Handcrafted Security: Towards Self-Evolving Defense for LLM Agents
- 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2026Beyond Single-Model Injection: A Threat Model and Defense Architecture for Prompt Injection in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
- 2026Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studies
- 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis