Recovering Sharp Conductivity Features in the Finite-Data Calder'on Problem with Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising framework for addressing the Calder'on inverse problem from limited boundary data. In this work, we revisit neural Calder'on inversion by introducing multiscale boundary excitations based on randomized wavelet functions and investigating the role of Fourier-feature encoding (FFE) for representing sharp conductivity variations. We propose a physics-informed reconstruction framework that represents the unknown conductivity and the associated family of electric potentials with separate neural networks conditioned on the applied boundary excitations. The governing elliptic PDE is enforced through physics-informed residuals, while finite Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) data are incorporated through boundary losses. Using synthetic data from a finite-difference forward solver, we evaluate the method on conductivity fields with inclusions, sharp interfaces, smooth profiles, and heterogeneous media. Results show that the framework recovers dominant conductivity structures from finite boundary measurements with relative errors between 3%-12% approximately. We show that FFE improves the reconstruction of localized sharp features, particularly for inclusions and interfaces, but are not universally optimal, with raw-coordinate networks performing competitively for smoother fields. These results highlight coordinate representations and boundary excitation design as key factors in neural Calder'on inversion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 37 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
- 2019Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Datacited by 262
- 2023Neural Inverse Operators for Solving PDE Inverse Problemscited by 65
- 2019Physical Symmetries Embedded in Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2020Solving Differential Equations Using Neural Network Solution Bundlescited by 21
- 2020Forecasting Hamiltonian dynamics without canonical coordinatescited by 17
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.