mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Output-Space Allocation Costs for Calibration-Guided LLM Compression: An Empirical Study

arXiv 2606.27785 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training-free compression methods for large language models (LLMs) often use calibration data to guide compression decisions. ROCKET, a recent method combining sparse-dictionary factorization with multi-choice knapsack problem (MCKP) allocation, derives its per-layer factorization from an output reconstruction objective but uses weight-space Frobenius error as the MCKP allocation cost. We investigate whether aligning the allocation cost with the output-space objective improves compressed model fidelity. On Qwen3-8B at 50% compression, our ROCKET-ActCost achieves +0.8 percentage points higher average accuracy across 8 zero-shot benchmarks (53.1% vs 52.3%), but increases WikiText perplexity by 16% (61.46 vs 52.98). This accuracy-perplexity tradeoff reveals that different allocation objectives favor different downstream metrics. The high correlation (>0.99) between weight-space and output-space errors limits allocation divergence, explaining the modest effect size. On Llama-3.2-1B at 20% compression, the two methods produce near-identical results (53.3% vs 53.5% accuracy, 14.45 vs 14.66 PPL), suggesting that the effect of the cost function is minor at lower compression ratios.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 22 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  5. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
  6. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  7. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
  8. 2023AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Accelerationcited by 1,298
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
  11. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
  12. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
8 more
  1. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
  2. 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
  3. 2023A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Modelscited by 269
  4. 2024SVD-LLM: Truncation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 243
  5. 2024Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 179
  6. 2023ASVD: Activation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Compressing Large Language Modelscited by 169
  7. 2025CoSpaDi: Compressing LLMs via Calibration-Guided Sparse Dictionary Learningcited by 6
  8. 2026ROCKET: Rapid Optimization via Calibration-guided Knapsack Enhanced Truncation for Efficient Model Compressioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.