mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CBD: API-Only LLM Black-Box Unlearning through Controlled Behavioral Divergence

arXiv 2606.27683 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Edge devices increasingly invoke large language models (LLMs) through API services for context aware edge intelligence, while edge generated data may be collected to improve LLMs and may introduce sensitive, copyrighted, harmful, or outdated information into model behavior. Machine unlearning offers a practical way to remove the influence of undesired data without retraining LLMs. However, existing methods still face two gaps. The first is API only black box access, where target model parameters and internal logits are unavailable. The second is how to preserve retained utility when unlearning target data and retained data share highly similar prompt structures or semantic patterns. To address these challenges, we propose Controlled Behavioral Divergence (CBD), an API only black box unlearning framework. CBD uses two auxiliary models to create controlled behavioral divergence between retained inputs and unlearning target inputs, converts this divergence into an unlearning relevance score, and routes unlearning related prompts away from the target LLM. To improve discrimination accuracy under high similarity between target and retained data, CBD constructs a gradient statistics based discriminative basis by estimating empirical Fisher matrices and solving a regularized generalized eigenvalue problem, guiding the unlearning signal toward target specific information rather than shared prompt structures. Compared with eleven white box and gray box unlearning baselines, CBD achieves a better unlearning utility trade off and its performance varies little across settings. On ToFU forget10, CBD approaches the retrained reference on the forget set while raising model utility to 74.90, about 15% above the second best baseline. On WMDP, it lowers hazardous knowledge accuracy to 25.68, near random guessing, while preserving MMLU accuracy of 52.67. Code is at https://github.com/DGL-codes/CBD.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 39 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.

Builds on

39 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 26

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Reveal and Release: Iterative LLM Unlearning with Self-generated Data18 Sep
  2. 2025Unilogit: Robust Machine Unlearning for LLMs Using Uniform-Target Self-Distillation9 May
  3. 2025Rectifying Belief Space via Unlearning to Harness LLMs' Reasoning28 Feb
  4. 2025Erasing Without Remembering: Implicit Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models27 Feb
  5. 2025A General Framework to Enhance Fine-tuning-based LLM Unlearning25 Feb
  6. 2024WAGLE: Strategic Weight Attribution for Effective and Modular Unlearning in Large Language Models23 Oct
  7. 2024LLM Unlearning via Loss Adjustment with Only Forget Data14 Oct
  8. 2024Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning9 Oct
  9. 2024Answer When Needed, Forget When Not: Language Models Pretend to Forget via In-Context Knowledge Unlearning1 Oct
  10. 2024On Large Language Model Continual Unlearning14 Jul
  11. 2024To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models2 Jul
  12. 2024Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models17 Jun
14 more
  1. 2024Avoiding Copyright Infringement via Large Language Model Unlearning16 Jun
  2. 2024Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference12 Jun
  3. 2024Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts12 Jun
  4. 2024SOUL: Unlocking the Power of Second-Order Optimization for LLM Unlearning28 Apr
  5. 2024Offset Unlearning for Large Language Models17 Apr
  6. 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
  7. 2024Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Models23 Feb
  8. 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models13 Feb
  9. 2024Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs1 Feb
  10. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
  11. 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs31 Oct
  12. 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
  13. 2023In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners11 Oct
  14. 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct

Other references · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  5. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  6. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  7. 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 618
  8. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  9. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 506
  10. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 443
  11. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
  12. 2023Can Sensitive Information Be Deleted From LLMs? Objectives for Defending Against Extraction Attackscited by 158
1 more
  1. 2024Mobile Edge Intelligence for Large Language Models: A Contemporary Surveycited by 128

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Harmonizing Multi-Objective LLM Unlearning via Unified Domain Representation and Bidirectional Logit Distillation
  2. 2026Unlearning in LLMs: Methods, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
  3. 2025LLM Unlearning via Neural Activation Redirection
  4. 2025LLM Unlearning using Gradient Ratio-Based Influence Estimation and Noise Injection
  5. 2025BLUR: A Bi-Level Optimization Approach for LLM Unlearning
  6. 2026Measuring the Depth of LLM Unlearning via Activation Patching
  7. 2026CAP: Controllable Alignment Prompting for Unlearning in LLMs
  8. 2026Modeling LLM Unlearning as an Asymmetric Two-Task Learning Problem