Jailbreaking for the Average Jane: Choosing Optimal Jailbreaks via Bandit Algorithms for Automatically Enhanced Queries
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
With a profusion of jailbreaks for LLMs now widely known, a growing concern is that non-expert malicious actors ("the average Jane") could elicit actionable responses to malicious requests. In this work, we examine whether this concern is justified. A non-expert malicious actor requires two ingredients for a successful attack: a powerful jailbreak for their target model, acting on an effective malicious query. For the former, we propose a novel attack strategy based on the multi-armed bandit framework. This allows efficient online learning of the optimal jailbreak from a large choice set via noisy exploration on a small number of queries, with subsequent application of the learnt policy on an exploitation set. For the latter, we curate FrankensteinBench, a safety benchmark of 11,279 malicious queries drawn from manual curation over 7 existing benchmarks, along with automated enhancement and generation. Each query is categorized as simple or complex by the technical expertise required to craft it. Our findings confirm the concern. Our bandit-based attack achieves success rates as high as 97% on average over 15 SoTA open-weight LLMs. Moreover, adding complexity to queries raises the attack success rate by up to 26% on average across models -- making it an effective, automatable prompting strategy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 38 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
38 of 96 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Adversarial D'ej`a Vu: Jailbreak Dictionary Learning for Stronger Generalization to Unseen Attacks24 Oct
- 2025MixAT: Combining Continuous and Discrete Adversarial Training for LLMs22 May
- 2025Speak Easy: Eliciting Harmful Jailbreaks from LLMs with Simple Interactions6 Feb
- 2024Latent Adversarial Training Improves Robustness to Persistent Harmful Behaviors in LLMs22 Jul
- 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attacks24 May
- 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks3 Apr
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
- 2023Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Models10 Oct
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
Other references · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
17 more
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
- 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 278
- 2019FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 264
- 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 223
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 176
- 2025EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representationscited by 139
- 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 102
- 2024Defending Against Unforeseen Failure Modes with Latent Adversarial Trainingcited by 88
- 2025The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating Itcited by 45
- 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI Systemcited by 31
- 2025Active Attacks: Red-teaming LLMs via Adaptive Environmentscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026JailbreakOPT: Tool-Assisted Iterative Jailbreak Prompt Optimization
- 2024RobustKV: Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via KV Eviction
- 2026How Jailbreak Attacks Inform Safety Alignment: A Defender-Centric, Shapley-Based Evaluation of Jailbreak Contributions
- 2024Play Guessing Game with LLM: Indirect Jailbreak Attack with Implicit Clues
- 2025Retrieval-Augmented Defense: Adaptive and Controllable Jailbreak Prevention for Large Language Models
- 2026JailMeter: An Evidence-Based Evaluation Framework for Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models
- 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models
- 2024AutoJailbreak: Exploring Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses through a Dependency Lens