mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

State-specific respiratory signatures for affective and stress recognition: Interpretable respiratory markers, autocorrelation lags, and compact CNN models

arXiv 2606.26723 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026eess.SP cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Respiratory activity is a direct and interpretable physiological channel for wearable stress and affective-state recognition, yet many studies emphasize classification accuracy without identifying which respiratory properties separate different states. Using the chest respiratory channel of the WESAD dataset, we analyze 60 s windows under leave-one-subject-out validation and combine two complementary branches: compact raw-signal one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) and physically grouped handcrafted respiratory signatures. The primary task is stress versus non-stress detection, while baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation are additionally analyzed in a one-vs-rest setting to reveal state-specific respiratory markers. The feature space is organized into respiratory timing, breath-to-breath variability, waveform statistics, spectral/time-frequency descriptors, and autocorrelation/nonlinear predictability descriptors, with the raw 60 s signal treated as a sixth representation for the CNN branch. We introduce autocorrelation transition lags (Zpm/Zmp) as interpretable markers of respiratory correlation scale and separately evaluate exploratory forecast-error-growth/Lyapunov-like descriptors. In the final CNN refit setting, the raw-signal model achieved the strongest stress-vs-rest performance (accuracy 96.72%, macro-F1 95.30%, MCC 90.61%). In contrast, compact feature models were stronger for baseline (MCC 65.34%), amusement (MCC 35.69%), and especially meditation (MCC 88.65%). Strict nested reanalysis of the auxiliary Top-20 stress search yielded mean MCC=82.29% versus 85.45% originally, indicating modest selection optimism. These results show that CNNs are most useful for the practical stress detector, whereas interpretable respiratory signatures provide stronger and more physiologically transparent state-specific markers for several non-stress conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

2 of 60 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023A Comparison of Personalized and Generalized Approaches to Emotion Recognition Using Consumer Wearable Devices: Machine Learning Studycited by 7
  2. 2026FEG-Pro: Forecast-Error Growth Profiling for Finite-Horizon Instability Analysis of Nonlinear Time Seriescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.