Self-Supervised Tree-level Biomass Estimation in Urban Environments From Airborne LiDAR and Optical Observations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Urban tree biomass remains less spatially explicitly quantified than biomass in managed forests because many estimates rely on inventories or coarse products that cannot resolve individual crowns or fine-scale heterogeneity. We present a crown-level above-ground biomass (AGB) framework for an 810~km2 landscape in Ontario, Canada, using leaf-off airborne LiDAR (8--10~pulses~m-2) and near-infrared RGB orthophotography (0.16--0.20~m) from 2018 and 2023. A dual-stream cross-attention network trained on rule-based pseudo-labels produced semantic marks for buildings, needleleaf trees, and deciduous trees, supporting crown delineation and functional-type assignment. On independently annotated withheld tiles, global/mean precision, recall, and Dice scores were 0.86, 0.83, and 0.84. Crowns were delineated with multiscale watershed segmentation in mapped tree areas, and AGB was estimated from a crown area--height power-law proxy calibrated to species-specific allometry (Lambert et al., 2005) for 21,921 inventory trees. For 18,713 inventory--segment matched pairs from a 90,726-tree held-out test set, AGB prediction achieved R2=0.609 using inventory crown geometry and R2=0.570 under operational segmentation, identifying crown delineation as the remaining uncertainty source. Aggregated to 30~m, estimates yielded total AGB stocks of 1.73~Tg in 2018 and 1.81~Tg in 2023 (811--850~Gg~C), local densities up to ~140~Mg~ha-1 along the Niagara Escarpment, and a net carbon gain of 39~Gg~C over five years. Deep-ensemble uncertainty maps highlighted high-epistemic-uncertainty areas linked to underrepresented land covers and guided assignment of uncertain crowns to a pooled allometric equation. The framework uses standard provincial data, requires no manual annotation, and produces a public bitemporal crown-level AGB database for trees outside forests at management-relevant resolution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 72 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
6 more
- 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
- 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 308
- 2019ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed datacited by 261
- 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
- 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 149
- 2021Seeing biodiversity: perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservationcited by 130
Built on by
Not cited yet.