mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reducing Redundancy in Whole-Slide Image Patching for Scalable Indexing and Retrieval

arXiv 2606.26157 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid growth of digital pathology has created an urgent need for efficient indexing and retrieval of whole slide images (WSIs). This need is intensified by emerging generative AI workflows, particularly retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which require dependable similarity search to support high-stakes clinical decision-making. Yet the substantial cost of high-performance storage limits the scalability and accessibility of WSI indexing for many healthcare institutions. Consequently, methods that can reduce storage demands while preserving retrieval accuracy have become a critical research priority. We propose ARReST (Antithetical Redundancy Reduction Strategy), a principled oppositional framework that leverages redundancy across dissimilar tissue classes to markedly decrease the number of patches that must be indexed from each WSI. Instead of eliminating only within-class duplicates, ARReST identifies antithetical patches-those whose representations contribute minimally to cross-class discrimination-and prunes them from the searchable archive. This targeted reduction substantially compresses the index without sacrificing morphological diversity or retrieval fidelity. By minimizing superfluous patch representations, ARReST reduces storage footprint, lowers computational overhead, and accelerates similarity search across large pathology repositories. Extensive experiments on TCGA repository (The Cancer Genome Atlas with 21 organs) demonstrate that ARReST achieves significant index compression while maintaining competitive retrieval performance. The observed storage savings of 3% to 60% (14%±13%) can be reliably achieved without compromising retrieval performance for many organs. The proposed strategy enables scalable, cost-efficient WSI indexing and is well-suited for next-generation retrieval-driven clinical AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Yottixel -- An Image Search Engine for Large Archives of Histopathology Whole Slide Imagescited by 41
  2. 2014Bag of Visual Words and Fusion Methods for Action Recognition: Comprehensive Study and Good Practicecited by 13
  3. 2024On Image Search in Histopathologycited by 12
  4. 2024Benchmarking Embedding Aggregation Methods in Computational Pathology: A Clinical Data Perspectivecited by 10
  5. 2016MinMax Radon Barcodes for Medical Image Retrievalcited by 9
  6. 2024Analysis and Validation of Image Search Engines in Histopathologycited by 7
  7. 2024SPLICE -- Streamlining Digital Pathology Image Processingcited by 4
  8. 2023Selection of Distinct Morphologies to Divide & Conquer Gigapixel Pathology Imagescited by 2
  9. 2024A Short Survey on Set-Based Aggregation Techniques for Single-Vector WSI Representation in Digital Pathologycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Act Like a Pathologist: Tissue-Aware Whole Slide Image Reasoning
  2. 2025SemaMIL: Semantic-Aware Multiple Instance Learning with Retrieval-Guided State Space Modeling for Whole Slide Images
  3. 2026Geometry-Aware State Space Model: A New Paradigm for Whole-Slide Image Representation
  4. 2026TC-SSA: Token Compression via Semantic Slot Aggregation for Gigapixel Pathology Reasoning
  5. 2026SlideMix: Enhancing Whole Slide Image Analysis via Multimodal Shuffling
  6. 2025PathVQ: Reforming Computational Pathology Foundation Model for Whole Slide Image Analysis via Vector Quantization
  7. 2025LanGuSTE: Language-Guided Coarse-to-Fine Patch Selection for Efficient Whole Slide Image Analysis
  8. 2026Multimodal Model for Computational Pathology:Representation Learning and Image Compression