mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Graph Learning for Calendar Spread Strategies in Commodity Futures Markets

arXiv 2606.25811 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026q-fin.TR cs.CE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Commodity futures can be represented hierarchically, with underlying assets at the upper level and individual futures contracts at the lower level. Entities at each level can be connected by edges reflecting inherent correlations, with cross-level edges capturing contract-to-underlying asset connections. Building on our observations of these structures, we propose a hierarchical graph learning approach for calendar spread (CS) strategies in commodity futures markets, addressing two significant gaps in the machine-learning literature: (i) the absence of learning-based methods for CS strategies in futures markets, and (ii) the lack of consideration of maturity-dependent interrelationships across commodity futures. We first establish the efficacy of CS strategies by analytically showing that CS strategies can possess higher risk-adjusted returns, measured by the information ratio, and lower risk, measured by variance and delta, than long-only strategies. We then introduce a method to convert learning-based predictions into CS positions. Next, we develop a hierarchical graph learning method that predicts futures price movements by utilizing the maturity-dependent interrelationships, thereby yielding a CS trading algorithm. Empirical results on commodity futures markets traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group demonstrate that our method outperforms benchmark models in both prediction and trading performance. We find that maturity-dependent interrelationships across commodity futures are instrumental in prediction and that CS trading based on hierarchical graph learning is effective for statistical arbitrage.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 48 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  4. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  5. 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
  6. 2021Deep Learning Statistical Arbitragecited by 13
  7. 2022Index Tracking via Learning to Predict Market Sensitivitiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.