mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Average-Power-Budgeted Underwater Vehicle Control via Constrained Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2606.25680 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Underwater vehicles operate from a fixed onboard energy budget that propulsion rapidly depletes, so a controller that completes its task while drawing less thruster power directly extends mission range and endurance. Reinforcement learning yields capable model-free controllers for station-keeping and trajectory tracking, but optimizing task accuracy alone drives the policy toward oscillatory, energy-wasting actuation. The established remedy subtracts an energy penalty from the reward, yet this sets the task-power trade-off through a single weight with no physical units: a target power level cannot be specified, the weight must be re-tuned for every vehicle and task, and a mismatched weight can even raise power. This paper instead formulates energy-efficient underwater control as a constrained Markov decision process in which average thruster power is subject to an explicit budget, solved with a PPO-Lagrangian algorithm. The power level is set by declaring a budget in physical units, and a single dual variable is updated online to meet it for each vehicle and task, without manual weight search. Across three vehicles and four tasks in the MarineGym simulator, the energy-constrained policy draws the least power in all twelve settings, reducing it by 14--65% (up to 64.9%) over a task-only baseline and below an energy-reward baseline everywhere, while remaining the smoothest in ten settings and preserving task accuracy except in one deliberately power-limited regime. Imposing energy as an explicit constraint thus offers a tuning-free route to energy-efficient underwater control that needs no per-vehicle, per-task weight search.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 51 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  4. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  5. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  6. 2021Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learningcited by 882
  7. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  8. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  9. 2019Constrained Reinforcement Learning Has Zero Duality Gapcited by 144
  10. 2019IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraintscited by 119
  11. 2023CUREE: A Curious Underwater Robot for Ecosystem Explorationcited by 11
  12. 2025MarineGym: A High-Performance Reinforcement Learning Platform for Underwater Roboticscited by 5
4 more
  1. 2017Depth Control of Model-Free AUVs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  2. 2019Multi Pseudo Q-learning Based Deterministic Policy Gradient for Tracking Control of Autonomous Underwater Vehiclescited by 4
  3. 2020Deep Interactive Reinforcement Learning for Path Following of Autonomous Underwater Vehiclecited by 4
  4. 2026Energy-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation of Articulated Components in Infrastructure Operation and Maintenancecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.