Reliability-Asymmetric Spacecraft Autonomy: Co-Designing a Capable Learned GNC Stack with a Verified, Adaptation-Aware Runtime Shield
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep-space missions need onboard autonomy that is both capable and certifiable. Rule-based autonomy is certifiable but brittle, while learned autonomy is capable but hard to verify. We present AMPLE-GNC, a three-tier guidance, navigation, and control stack. Its capability path combines a small foundation-model commander that maps natural language to PDDL+, a constraint-screening verifier, and a fault-adaptive controller. All three are bounded by a runtime shield with nine linear-temporal-logic invariants whose predictor soundness is machine-checked by the Kind 2 model checker. On a 6-DOF Basilisk testbed, we make three contributions. First, we deploy an edge commander. Fine-tuning a pretrained 360M model with grammar-constrained decoding gives a hard output-validity guarantee and 84% planner-executable actions. On a de-leaked test, novel-phrasing generalization is 38% exact and 51% action, rising to 48% exact after phrasing-diversity re-finetuning; we separate syntactic validity from semantic accuracy. Second, we introduce a fault-adaptive controller. Rapid Motor Adaptation infers latent actuator faults online and recovers 97.8% of actuator-sign faults and 94.4% of continuous-gain faults within the training randomization envelope. Fault-unaware PD and from-scratch end-to-end RL both score 0%, while the strongest classical-adaptive baseline reaches 55% on continuous gain. Beyond the envelope, a split-conformant retrain scores 57-67%, and adding 4x more in-regime data worsens performance, showing that randomization breadth, not data volume, drives generalization. Robustness is flat under star-tracker noise to 0.005. Third, we show that a latching safe-hold shield can suppress even a capable controller. A split-conformal recovery-deadline certificate with adaptation-aware engagement reconciles safety and recovery, keeping the controller 94.5% autonomous while still catching non-recovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.
Builds on
15 of 33 references.
References · 15
- 2021RMA: Rapid Motor Adaptation for Legged Robotscited by 430
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 332
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 186
- 2024Compact Language Models via Pruning and Knowledge Distillationcited by 142
- 2022Neural-Fly Enables Rapid Learning for Agile Flight in Strong Windscited by 80
- 2024Planetarium: A Rigorous Benchmark for Translating Text to Structured Planning Languagescited by 32
- 2019Neural Simplex Architecturecited by 27
- 2021Comparing Run Time Assurance Approaches for Safe Spacecraft Dockingcited by 4
- 2025Statistically Assuring Safety of Control Systems using Ensembles of Safety Filters and Conformal Predictioncited by 4
- 2024Transformer-Based Fault-Tolerant Control for Fixed-Wing UAVs Using Knowledge Distillation and In-Context Adaptationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.