mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Re-Ranking

arXiv 2606.25249 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2026cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern Information Retrieval (IR) systems typically use a "retrieve-then-rerank" pipeline, where a computationally expensive, pre-determined cross-encoder re-ranks the top results from a fast initial retriever. While effective, this approach often applies heavy re-ranking models regardless of query complexity, resulting in high latency and wasted computational resources on simple queries. We propose Adaptive Re-Ranking, an utility-based labeling framework for cost-aware routing and present empirical evidence (via oracle analysis and a trained baseline router) that per-query routing offers large potential gains but is non-trivial to learn from limited supervision. We train a routing classifier with 3 strategies: sparse retrieval (BM25), dense re-ranking (MiniLM-L6-v2), and heavy neural re-ranking (BGE-v2-m3). Compared to BGE our method achieves 1.15-53x lower median latency and 1.11-5.22x lower mean latency across all datasets we have tested, while delivering -17.5% to +4.0% nDCG@10, which is competitive in some datasets. Our findings show that routing queries based on our novel utility function offers a scalable solution for reducing computational costs and latency in a variety of IR systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.