mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Laplace-Fisher Gate Identities for Optimal Matrix-Gated Blended Score Estimation

arXiv 2606.25169 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026math.ST cs.LG stat.THcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sampling from an unnormalized target density by reversing an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck diffusion requires the score of each noise-perturbed marginal law. Two exact identities are available: Tweedie's identity and a target-score identity, each yielding unbiased finite-reference score estimators for the OU-marginal score. Score estimators induced by scalar blends of Tweedie and TSI score estimators can reduce variance, but they are too rigid for singular or strongly anisotropic targets. We formulate blended score estimation as a conditional risk-minimization problem over matrix valued blending coefficients, referred to as gates. Our central result is to show the optimal matrix valued gate for blended score estimation is given [ G_star(y,t) = αt2 left(αt2 Id + γt, mathbbE[H0(X0)mid Yt=y] right)-1, qquad H0=-nabla2log p0 .] Here αt = e-t and γt = 1-e-2t are the OU coefficients, and the conditional expectation is under the OU posterior of X0 given Yt=y. We call this formula the Laplace-Fisher Gate Identity (LFGI). Because the Tweedie-TSI disagreement has conditional mean zero, the gate changes the score-estimator variance but not its expected value. We derive the variance-optimal matrix gate, record the Gaussian special case, and establish finite-reference consistency and stability bounds for estimating the gate from weighted reference samples. We then use the finite-reference LFGI score estimator for normalized density evaluation in Bayesian inverse problems. In regimes where MCMC pilot samples and derivative information are already available, LFGI uses those byproducts to construct a normalized surrogate for the posterior density. The resulting surrogate supplies information that the MCMC samples alone do not provide: posterior-energy evaluation, model-evidence estimation, and downstream density-based diagnostics. On a PDE-constrained inverse-problem benchmark, the LFGI surrogate improves posterior-density calibration and sampling diagnostics relative to the other tested score-estimator classes. Experiments using LFGI with known model evidence check absolute evidence calibration in both Gaussian and non-Gaussian settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 67 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 507
  2. 2024Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann Densitiescited by 116
  3. 2025Adjoint Sampling: Highly Scalable Diffusion Samplers via Adjoint Matchingcited by 85
  4. 2024Particle Denoising Diffusion Samplercited by 65
  5. 2024Target Score Matchingcited by 50
  6. 2025Control Variate Score Matching for Diffusion Modelscited by 6
  7. 2026Diffusion Path Samplers via Sequential Monte Carlocited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.