mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training for the Model You Return: Improving Optimization for Iterate-Averaged Language Models

arXiv 2606.25086 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many modern Language Model (LM) pipelines return an averaged model, such as an exponential moving average of the training iterates, rather than the final iterate itself. This raises a fundamental question: given that we will return an iterate average, how should we change training to improve the performance of this average? We study this question by formulating optimizer design for the iterate-average estimator as an optimal-control problem. In a continuous-time stochastic quadratic model, we solve for the control strategy that minimizes the error of the returned average subject to a penalty on the size of the intervention. A practical approximation to this controller yields PACE, a lightweight wrapper around AdamW that pulls the live weights toward their exponential moving average with a clipped, per-coordinate control strength. We prove that a stylized version of PACE converges at the standard stochastic convex optimization rate, up to a factor depending on the averaging rule, while in the quadratic setting it can strictly improve the limiting squared error of the iterate-average estimator and can do so by an arbitrarily large factor on some instances. Empirically, our results suggest that PACE improves over AdamW and EMA-evaluated AdamW in supervised fine-tuning of 1-2B parameter LMs and in GPT-2 pretraining on FineWeb for a wide range of learning rates, decay schedules, and other hyperparameters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

28 of 45 references.

References · 28

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  3. 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  5. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
  6. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  7. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  8. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 426
  9. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
  10. 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 336
  11. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 335
  12. 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 265
16 more
  1. 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 192
  2. 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 163
  3. 2020Generative Modeling with Denoising Auto-Encoders and Langevin Samplingcited by 119
  4. 2019Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Modelcited by 117
  5. 2014Analysis and Design of Optimization Algorithms via Integral Quadratic Constraintscited by 105
  6. 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 104
  7. 2014Deep learning with Elastic Averaging SGDcited by 90
  8. 2024Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 81
  9. 2022Stop Wasting My Time! Saving Days of ImageNet and BERT Training with Latest Weight Averagingcited by 54
  10. 2024The AdEMAMix Optimizer: Better, Faster, Oldercited by 54
  11. 2023How to Scale Your EMAcited by 24
  12. 2023Butterfly Effects of SGD Noise: Error Amplification in Behavior Cloning and Autoregressioncited by 14
  13. 2025Through the River: Understanding the Benefit of Schedule-Free Methods for Language Model Trainingcited by 9
  14. 2021KOALA: A Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss Adaptivitycited by 6
  15. 2025EMA Without the Lag: Bias-Corrected Iterate Averaging Schemescited by 3
  16. 2025KOALA++: Efficient Kalman-Based Optimization with Gradient-Covariance Productscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.