mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Matching Tasks to Objectives: Fine-Tuning and Prompt-Tuning Strategies for Encoder-Decoder Pre-trained Language Models

arXiv 2606.24841 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based learning has emerged as a dominant paradigm in natural language processing. This study explores the impact of diverse pre-training objectives on the performance of encoder-decoder pre-trained language models across generation and question answering tasks, with a focus on commonsense knowledge retrieval and completion. We highlight the benefits of incorporating multiple objectives during both pre-training and fine-tuning stages. We introduce the Match Task to Objective (MTO) framework and methods for determining the appropriate objective for a given task. This framework offers automated methods to prepare task-related data for adaptation through unsupervised training, based on the identified objective. In the fine-tuning stage, we design novel templates that align with the objectives of the pre-training and adaptation stages. When aligned with task requirements, these strategies can achieve a performance gain of over 120% compared to conventional methods in few-shot settings. They significantly outperform related works in few-shot settings and exceed the baseline even in full-dataset scenarios. Furthermore, we extend this approach to include prompt-tuning methodologies, providing guidance for more effective soft prompt engineering and optimization. Our strategies significantly enhance prompt-tuning performance as well. These insights hold substantial value, precisely guiding the selection and optimization of models customized for specific tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/puraminy/MTO/

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

42 of 52 references.

References · 42

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  7. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  8. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
  9. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,936
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  11. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  12. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
30 more
  1. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
  2. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
  3. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  4. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 476
  5. 2019COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Constructioncited by 450
  6. 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 388
  7. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  8. 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
  9. 2021Symbolic Knowledge Distillation: from General Language Models to Commonsense Modelscited by 270
  10. 2020COMET-ATOMIC 2020: On Symbolic and Neural Commonsense Knowledge Graphscited by 254
  11. 2020AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Promptscited by 249
  12. 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
  13. 2022GreaseLM: Graph REASoning Enhanced Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 171
  14. 2022What Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?cited by 150
  15. 2020Scalable Multi-Hop Relational Reasoning for Knowledge-Aware Question Answeringcited by 122
  16. 2021Knowledgeable or Educated Guess? Revisiting Language Models as Knowledge Basescited by 107
  17. 2021UNICORN on RAINBOW: A Universal Commonsense Reasoning Model on a New Multitask Benchmarkcited by 98
  18. 2019Evaluating Commonsense in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 95
  19. 2020Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Trainingcited by 87
  20. 2023Knowledge-Augmented Reasoning Distillation for Small Language Models in Knowledge-Intensive Taskscited by 64
  21. 2020Pre-training Text-to-Text Transformers for Concept-centric Common Sensecited by 42
  22. 2021BERTnesia: Investigating the capture and forgetting of knowledge in BERTcited by 40
  23. 2021Analyzing Commonsense Emergence in Few-shot Knowledge Modelscited by 34
  24. 2022GeoMLAMA: Geo-Diverse Commonsense Probing on Multilingual Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 30
  25. 2021ASER: Towards Large-scale Commonsense Knowledge Acquisition via Higher-order Selectional Preference over Eventualitiescited by 28
  26. 2023The Life Cycle of Knowledge in Big Language Models: A Surveycited by 23
  27. 2021GNN is a Counter? Revisiting GNN for Question Answeringcited by 21
  28. 2022Acquiring and Modelling Abstract Commonsense Knowledge via Conceptualizationcited by 17
  29. 2023Understanding Finetuning for Factual Knowledge Extraction from Language Modelscited by 13
  30. 2022Great Truths are Always Simple: A Rather Simple Knowledge Encoder for Enhancing the Commonsense Reasoning Capacity of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.