VeryTrace: Verifying Reasoning Traces through Compilable Formalism and Structured Verification
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-step reasoning with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting remains fragile: logical errors or hallucinations in early steps silently propagate, producing confident but incorrect conclusions. This paper presents VeryTrace, a zero-shot verification-and-repair framework that formalizes natural-language reasoning traces into a structured, compilable representation. VeryTrace introduces a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) that (i) makes step dependencies explicit, (ii) mechanizes quantitative content as executable expressions, and (iii) structures semantic inferences via deduction schemas. Our hybrid verifier combines deterministic checks for computational correctness, dependency resolution, and constraint satisfaction with targeted LLM audits for non-mechanizable semantic judgments, enabling step-level error localization and repair. Across three diverse domains-competition mathematics (AIME 2025), robotics planning (LLM-BabyBench), and kinship reasoning (CLUTRR), VeryTrace improves accuracy over zero-shot baselines on state-of-the-art LLMs without requiring domain-specific training or in-context examples, demonstrating that formalized trace verification achieves both precision and generalization.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 40 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.
Builds on
40 of 55 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Typed Chain-of-Thought: A Curry-Howard Framework for Verifying LLM Reasoning1 Oct
- 2024Solving Zebra Puzzles Using Constraint-Guided Multi-Agent Systems4 Jul
- 2023Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning6 Jun
- 2022Making Large Language Models Better Reasoners with Step-Aware Verifier6 Jun
Other references · 36
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
- 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 876
24 more
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 871
- 2023LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiencycited by 496
- 2022LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 459
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 372
- 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 369
- 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
- 2022Draft, Sketch, and Prove: Guiding Formal Theorem Provers with Informal Proofscited by 278
- 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 277
- 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 252
- 2023Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verificationcited by 166
- 2019CLUTRR: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Inductive Reasoning from Textcited by 155
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 149
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 130
- 2025Process Reward Models That Thinkcited by 118
- 2015Program Synthesis from Polymorphic Refinement Typescited by 20
- 2025Verifying Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Its Computational Graphcited by 20
- 2025Boosting LLM Reasoning via Spontaneous Self-Correctioncited by 18
- 2025Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verificationcited by 16
- 2025Zero-Shot Verification-guided Chain of Thoughtscited by 9
- 2025Logic.py: Bridging the Gap between LLMs and Constraint Solverscited by 9
- 2024Towards Logically Sound Natural Language Reasoning with Logic-Enhanced Language Model Agentscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens
- 2026LiveMathematicianBench: A Live Benchmark for Research-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Proof Sketches
- 2025FOL-Traces: Verified First-Order Logic Reasoning Traces at Scale
- 2026Pushing the Boundaries of Natural Reasoning: Interleaved Bonus from Formal-Logic Verification
- 2026Pencil Puzzle Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Step Verifiable Reasoning
- 2026ArgGYM: A Procedural, Engine-Verified Benchmark for Structured Defeasible Reasoning
- 2026The Tell-Tale Trace: Detecting Reasoning Failures in LLMs Using Chain-of-Thought Dynamics
- 2026A2RBench: An Automatic Paradigm for Formally Verifiable Abstract Reasoning Benchmark Generation