mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning the Koopman Operator using Attention Free Transformers

arXiv 2606.23957 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning Koopman operators with autoencoders enables linear prediction in a latent space, but long-horizon rollouts often drift off the learned manifold, leading to phase and amplitude errors on systems with switching, continuous spectra, or strong transients. We introduce two complementary components that make Koopman predictors more robust. First, we add an attention-free latent memory (AFT) block that aggregates a short window of past latents to produce a corrected latent before each Koopman update. Unlike multi-head attention, AFT operates in linear time and adds only ≈30k parameters (3d2 + T2, fewer than matched multi-head attention), yet captures the local temporal context needed to suppress error divergence. Second, we propose dynamic re-encoding: lightweight, online change-point triggers (EWMA, CUSUM, and sequential two-sample tests) that detect latent drift and project predictions back onto the autoencoder manifold. Across three benchmark systems -- Duffing oscillator, Repressilator, IRMA -- our model consistently reduces error accumulation compared to a Koopman autoencoder and matched-capacity multi-head attention. We also compare against GRU and Transformer autoencoders, evaluated both from initial conditions and with a 50-step context, and find that Koopman+AFT (with optional re-encoding) attains markedly lower long-horizon error while maintaining lower inference latency. We report improvements over horizons up to 1000 steps, together with ablations over trigger policies. The result is a fast, compact predictor that stays on the learned manifold over long horizons.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  2. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  3. 2017Linearly-Recurrent Autoencoder Networks for Learning Dynamicscited by 142
  4. 2021An Attention Free Transformercited by 111
  5. 2017On Convergence of Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition to the Koopman Operatorcited by 70
  6. 2019Physics-Informed Probabilistic Learning of Linear Embeddings of Non-linear Dynamics With Guaranteed Stabilitycited by 53
  7. 2016Generalizing Koopman Theory to allow for inputs and controlcited by 49
  8. 2021Rigorous data-driven computation of spectral properties of Koopman operators for dynamical systemscited by 44
  9. 2022Koopman Neural Forecaster for Time Series with Temporal Distribution Shiftscited by 35
  10. 2021Deep Learning Enhanced Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 19
  11. 2024Temporally Consistent Koopman Autoencoders for Forecasting Dynamical Systemscited by 15
  12. 2024Koopman Operators in Robot Learningcited by 13
7 more
  1. 2019Dynamic mode decomposition for multiscale nonlinear physicscited by 4
  2. 2017An Optimal Control Formulation of Pulse-Based Control Using Koopman Operatorcited by 3
  3. 2019Data-driven approximations of dynamical systems operators for controlcited by 3
  4. 2025Augmented Invertible Koopman Autoencoder for long-term time series forecastingcited by 3
  5. 2023Course Correcting Koopman Representationscited by 2
  6. 2022Data-Driven Observability Decomposition with Koopman Operators for Optimization of Output Functions of Nonlinear Systemscited by 1
  7. 2024Loss Terms and Operator Forms of Koopman Autoencoderscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.