The Measurable Majority
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies strict majority reasoning in finite electorates using so-called textitsocial decision frames: finite sets of voters equipped with distinguished families of coalitions interpreted as those voting blocs evaluated to form a strict majority. A coherence criterion for qualitative majority judgments is identified and shown to give an exact characterization for representability of strict majorities by finitely additive measures. In addition, a minimal natural logic for reasoning about strict majorities is shown to be sound and complete. These developments motivate examination of associated combinatorial questions concerning incoherence in finite families of sets; partial results and a conjecture are given. Finally, the results of this paper are applied to correct a classical representation theorem for weak qualitative probability structures due to Patrick Suppes and to establish a May-type characterization for ordinary strict majority rule for social decision frames.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
1 of 23 references.
References · 1
- 2018Exploring the Landscape of Relational Syllogistic Logicscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Measurable Majorities Are Not Finitely Axiomatizablecited by 0
- 2026Measurable Majorities Are Not Finitely Axiomatizable24 Jun 2026