Solve for the Hyperparameter, Skip the Search: Kolmogorov-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spline Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hyperparameter tuning almost always means search: fit the model at every value on a grid, score each by cross-validation, and keep the winner. For spline regression that search is unnecessary. The optimal resolution can be solved for in closed form, to the accuracy an exhaustive search reaches, at a fraction of the compute. Three ingredients make this possible: classical approximation theory pins the squared bias to a known power of the resolution G, exactly the Kolmogorov n-width of the smoothness class; the basis dimension is an explicit polynomial in G; and leave-one-out error follows from a single fit via the PRESS identity. Balancing the two known curves gives the minimizer analytically. We extend this calculus to many coordinates by replacing ambient input dimension with interaction order, the number of active low-order components in an ANOVA decomposition, yielding a scaling law in which the optimal resolution and error are power functions of the effective density (sample size per active component), with input dimension absent from the exponent. The law becomes an algorithm. KORE (Kolmogorov-optimal Order-aware Resolution Estimation) fits two pilot resolutions, solves a leverage-calibrated 2x2 system for the bias and noise scales, and evaluates the closed-form plug-in resolution with a tiny leave-one-out certificate: about a dozen fits instead of a full grid sweep, with a consistency guarantee as the sample grows. Across additive and sparse pairwise targets up to 80 input dimensions, KORE matches exhaustive 3-fold cross-validation and the full classical ladder (GCV, Mallows' Cp, AIC, BIC) while fitting roughly 8x fewer models; on 36 real tabular datasets it ranks first among 21 methods in accuracy per unit of compute, ahead of tuned boosters and kernel machines. When complexity lives in low interaction order, solving for the resolution beats searching for it.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 42 references.
References · 8
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,494
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,972
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 467
- 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 375
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2022AMLB: an AutoML Benchmarkcited by 55
- 2024Machine Learning vs Deep Learning: The Generalization Problemcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.