mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

POTracker: Optimizing Large Language Models for Standard-Compliant Power Outage Report Generation

arXiv 2606.23533 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent large language models (LLMs) are good at general text generation, but it is still hard to use them for domain-specific data generation because the output must follow strict formatting and structural rules. Unlike open-ended tasks such as question answering or translation, domain-specific generation must be both semantically correct and compliant with existing guidelines and standards. In this work, we study the nationwide interoperability problem of utility power outage reports in the United States. In practice, outage reports need to be machine-readable (e.g., JSON or XML) and must strictly follow requirements from energy-sector regulatory bodies. To address this problem, we propose POTracker, an optimized LLM for power outage report generation. We fine-tune Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct using our proposed objective. The key contribution is a new loss function, POTrackerLoss, that considers both textual similarity and structural (tag) similarity between the generated report and the ground-truth report. We evaluate POTracker on a dataset of 1,000 power outage reports and compare it with five well-known fine-tuning methods and one rule-based XML conversion method. Results show that POTracker outperforms other fine-tuning approaches, improving overall accuracy by up to 51% and reaching 86.47% structural accuracy for generated power outage reports. In addition, we conduct a human study to assess the quality of the ground-truth standard reports, where domain experts assign the generated labels an average score of 4.03 on a 0--5 scale.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  6. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  8. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 906
  9. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 834
  10. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  11. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 445
  12. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 127
4 more
  1. 2024The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 64
  2. 2024Injecting New Knowledge into Large Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 58
  3. 2024LLM4DS: Evaluating Large Language Models for Data Science Code Generationcited by 7
  4. 2023AutoParLLM: GNN-guided Context Generation for Zero-Shot Code Parallelization using LLMscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.