mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stage-dependent integer-binary encoding in factorization-machine black-box optimization

arXiv 2606.23188 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Black-box optimization (BBO) deals with problems where objective functions lack explicit analytical forms and are expensive to evaluate. Factorization machine with quadratic-optimization annealing (FMQA) constructs a surrogate model using a factorization machine (FM) and optimizes it with an Ising machine. Conventional FMQA applies a single integer-binary encoding throughout the optimization process, although the encoding best suited to surrogate learning may differ from the one best suited to Ising-machine solution search. We propose a stage-dependent FMQA framework and derive conversion formulas between one-hot and domain-wall QUBO matrices that preserve the surrogate objective over feasible integer states up to an additive constant. We evaluate the OhDw variant, which employs one-hot encoding for learning and domain-wall encoding for search, on the Rastrigin function with input dimensions N = 2 and 5 and discretization levels q = 61 and 301. Across all conditions, the dominant factor governing optimization performance is the encoding used in the learning stage, with one-hot encoding consistently yielding lower residual errors than domain-wall or binary encoding. The additional benefit of switching to domain-wall encoding for solution search is condition-dependent. For N = 5 and q = 301, OhDw achieves a lower residual error and solutions closer to the global optimum than one-hot-only FMQA, whereas for N = 5 and q = 61 the latter achieves a lower residual error. These results indicate that one-hot encoding in the learning stage is the primary performance driver and that stage-dependent encoding can provide further improvement under finer discretization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 64 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 744
  3. 2019Combinatorial Bayesian Optimization using the Graph Cartesian Productcited by 79
  4. 2018Bayesian Optimization of Combinatorial Structurescited by 64
  5. 2017Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealercited by 29
  6. 2022Application of QUBO solver using black-box optimization to structural design for resonance avoidancecited by 17
  7. 2017Quantum Annealing Applied to De-Conflicting Optimal Trajectories for Air Traffic Managementcited by 13
  8. 2020Portfolio Optimisation Using the D-Wave Quantum Annealercited by 10
  9. 2022Black-box optimization for integer-variable problems using Ising machines and factorization machinescited by 8
  10. 2020A supervised learning approach involving active subspaces for an efficient genetic algorithm in high-dimensional optimization problemscited by 6
  11. 2025A black-box optimization method with polynomial-based kernels and quadratic-optimization annealingcited by 4
  12. 2025SWIFT-FMQA: Enhancing Factorization Machine with Quadratic-Optimization Annealing via Sliding Windowcited by 4
6 more
  1. 2026Effectiveness of Binary Autoencoders for QUBO-Based Optimization Problemscited by 3
  2. 2024Annealing-Assisted Column Generation for Inequality-Constrained Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 2
  3. 2024Function Smoothing Regularization for Precision Factorization Machine Annealing in Continuous Variable Optimization Problemscited by 2
  4. 2025Subsampling Factorization Machine Annealingcited by 1
  5. 2026Factorization Machine with Quadratic-Optimization Annealing for RNA Inverse Folding and Evaluation of Binary-Integer Encoding and Nucleotide Assignmentcited by 1
  6. 2026Improving FMQA via Initial Training Data Design Considering Marginal Bit Coverage in One-Hot Encodingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.