mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Expert Consensus on Criteria for the Automated Assessment of Laparoscopic Camera Navigation

arXiv 2606.23131 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) is a critical skill, yet its current assessment typically relies on manual rating systems which are time-consuming and difficult to scale. Automated feedback could significantly enhance surgical training by providing immediate, standardized metrics. This study aims to define, clinically evaluate the relevance, and establish the technical readiness of a set of approaches for LCN assessment. Methods: We developed a detailed taxonomy of 14 key aspects of camera navigation, categorized into Framing & Composition, Visibility & Clarity, Orientation & Stability, Motion & Dynamics, and Safety & Awareness. For each aspect, we assessed the technological readiness of automated measurement based on the current state of the art (SoTA) in computer vision (CV). To establish clinical relevance, we designed a survey for practicing laparoscopic surgeons to rate the importance of each aspect on a 5-point Likert scale and to select the five most critical skills. Results: 23 surgeons participated in the survey. Foundational aspects like Field of View, Focus and Centering were rated as most important by surgeons. We present a "Clinical Importance vs. CV Technological Readiness" matrix, identifying high-priority targets for development--aspects that are both clinically crucial and technologically ready to measure. Conclusion: This work establishes a foundational framework for quantifying LCN skills. By aligning surgeon priorities with CV capabilities, we provide a clear roadmap for automatic skill assessment. This foundation enables the development of AI-driven assistance tools that can accelerate the learning curve for surgical assistants and potentially improve surgical safety and efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 50 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 878
  2. 2016EndoNet: A Deep Architecture for Recognition Tasks on Laparoscopic Videoscited by 367
  3. 2021Rendezvous: Attention Mechanisms for the Recognition of Surgical Action Triplets in Endoscopic Videoscited by 141
  4. 2022AutoLaparo: A New Dataset of Integrated Multi-tasks for Image-guided Surgical Automation in Laparoscopic Hysterectomycited by 85
  5. 2023LoViT: Long Video Transformer for Surgical Phase Recognitioncited by 56
  6. 2023Learning How To Robustly Estimate Camera Pose in Endoscopic Videoscited by 50
  7. 2024EndoGSLAM: Real-Time Dense Reconstruction and Tracking in Endoscopic Surgeries using Gaussian Splattingcited by 33
  8. 2019A deep learning framework for quality assessment and restoration in video endoscopycited by 24
  9. 2023A spatio-temporal network for video semantic segmentation in surgical videoscited by 17
  10. 2023CholecTrack20: A Multi-Perspective Tracking Dataset for Surgical Toolscited by 17
  11. 2024CudaSIFT-SLAM: multiple-map visual SLAM for full procedure mapping in real human endoscopycited by 11
  12. 2018Adaptive specular reflection detection and inpainting in colonoscopy video framescited by 3
3 more
  1. 2025Conformal forecasting for surgical instrument trajectorycited by 3
  2. 2022A Neural Network based Framework for Effective Laparoscopic Video Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  3. 2023BDIS-SLAM: A lightweight CPU-based dense stereo SLAM for surgerycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.