Catching Lies Without Sending the Video: Privacy-Preserving Multimodal Deception Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frontier multimodal models can guess whether a person is lying from a testimony video. To do so, they stream that raw face and voice to a third-party model. We ask whether the heavy media is needed at all. On the Real-life Trial Deception dataset, Whissle on-device speech and vision stack extracts a compact digest: transcript, emotion, age, gender, intent distributions, a deception intent filter, fluency and rhythm, per-frame facial behaviour, and prosody. Under speaker-independent evaluation, we report three findings. A small classifier on this digest reaches AUC 0.741, matching Gemini 2.5 Pro on full video. Handing the digest to a frontier LLM reaches AUC 0.755 with Claude Opus 4.8 at 7.8X fewer input tokens, with no media leaving the device. The reported 75% accuracy is a speaker-leakage artifact. We release code and experiments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
2 of 7 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.