mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training-free Task Classification for Multi-Task Model Merging

arXiv 2606.22589 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ever since the advent of foundation models and the pre-training-finetuning paradigm, there have been numerous efforts to merge multiple task-specific experts into a single multi-task model. Prior work largely focuses on finding a single merged model, but it often underperforms individual experts due to parameter interference. To resolve this, dynamic model merging employs routing to activate task-relevant parameters per input. However, existing routers typically require either additional training with abundant labeled datasets or assume the access to task IDs of each input at inference time. In this work, we aim to close the gap to expert performance without additional training or task-ID-access assumption. To this end, we formulate routing as training-free task classification for each test input. Using singular value decomposition (SVD)-based low-rank manifold approximations for each task, SiM scores tasks by the projection residual of the test input feature onto each task manifold and routes accordingly. The task manifolds are pre-computable offline from a pretrained backbone using a small per-task support set (e.g., 32 examples per task) prior to merging process, requiring no router training and no data during the merging process. Moreover, SiM integrates seamlessly with subspace-/mask-based merging that represents task-expert via lightweight compressed task vectors, avoiding the need to store full expert parameters. Experiments across computer vision and natural language processing benchmarks under task-unknown inference demonstrate that SiM substantially improves merged-model performance and consistently narrows the gap to individual task experts. Our code is available at https://github.com/BAIKLAB/SiM

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

46 of 88 references.

References · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  7. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  10. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  12. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
34 more
  1. 2019StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple Domainscited by 1,098
  2. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  3. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  4. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  5. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
  6. 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 621
  7. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  8. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
  9. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
  10. 2022Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Modelscited by 387
  11. 2016AID: A Benchmark Dataset for Performance Evaluation of Aerial Scene Classificationcited by 347
  12. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 302
  13. 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
  14. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 252
  15. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 221
  16. 2016Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detectioncited by 219
  17. 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 147
  18. 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 131
  19. 2024Twin-Merging: Dynamic Integration of Modular Expertise in Model Mergingcited by 116
  20. 2024EMR-Merging: Tuning-Free High-Performance Model Mergingcited by 110
  21. 2025No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspacescited by 96
  22. 2019QuaRTz: An Open-Domain Dataset of Qualitative Relationship Questionscited by 89
  23. 2024Merging Multi-Task Models via Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Expertscited by 85
  24. 2018DeepWeeds: A Multiclass Weed Species Image Dataset for Deep Learningcited by 69
  25. 2022The ArtBench Dataset: Benchmarking Generative Models with Artworkscited by 64
  26. 2022Rank Diminishing in Deep Neural Networkscited by 47
  27. 2024A Decade's Battle on Dataset Bias: Are We There Yet?cited by 47
  28. 2025Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descentcited by 39
  29. 2017Fruit recognition from images using deep learningcited by 35
  30. 2024DaWin: Training-free Dynamic Weight Interpolation for Robust Adaptationcited by 19
  31. 2025Efficient Model Editing with Task-Localized Sparse Fine-tuningcited by 16
  32. 2025Mitigating Parameter Interference in Model Merging via Sharpness-Aware Fine-Tuningcited by 16
  33. 2022MangoLeafBD: A Comprehensive Image Dataset to Classify Diseased and Healthy Mango Leavescited by 13
  34. 2025Subspace-Boosted Model Mergingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.