Concept-Constrained Prompt Learning for Few-Shot CLIP Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Few-shot prompt learning is an effective strategy for adapting CLIP to downstream tasks, but class-only prompt optimization can overfit base-class supervision and weaken transfer to unseen classes. We propose Concept-Constrained Prompt Learning (CCPL), a lightweight regularization framework that anchors learnable class prompts to frozen concept-level text prototypes without updating CLIP encoders. CCPL learns a set of shared context tokens, instantiates class prompts by appending class names, and constructs frozen concept prototypes from a class-level concept bank. During training, a text-space cosine consistency objective aligns learnable class-prompt embeddings with frozen concept prototypes; concept dropout provides additional regularization against over-reliance on fixed concept lists. At inference, CCPL optionally fuses class-prompt logits with concept-prototype logits using a controllable ensemble weight alpha. Our default configuration uses text-space concept regularization lambda = 0.5, concept dropout p = 0.3 and weak concept-guided fusion (alpha = 0.1), with no KL-based prediction consistency term. Experiments under identical automatically-generated fallback splits show that CCPL improves the base-to-new harmonic mean on DTD (+0.6) and EuroSAT (+2.9) compared with CoOp, while remaining near-neutral on OxfordPets (-0.1). Ablations indicate that text-space concept regularization is consistently beneficial, while the best concept-guided inference strength is dataset- and protocol-sensitive. These results suggest concept constraints are most effective when concept prototypes align naturally with dataset semantics, and identify fine-grained categories as a current boundary condition. The code is released at: https://github.com/richael-sang/concept-constrained-prompt-learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
13 of 15 references.
References · 13
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
- 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 431
- 2022Prompt-aligned Gradient for Prompt Tuningcited by 341
- 2022Visual Classification via Description from Large Language Modelscited by 336
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.