Mitigating Measurement-Induced Training Instability in Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks for Protein Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hybrid Quantum Neural Network (QNN) classifiers produce logits as expectation values of quantum measurement operators. For standard Pauli measurements, these outputs are intrinsically bounded to the interval [-1,1]. When such bounded logits are used directly with the cross-entropy loss applied to softmax-normalized logits for multi-class classification, the loss function operates in a regime of weak sensitivity to logit differences. As a consequence, parameter gradients are suppressed, leading to unstable optimization in variational quantum classifiers (VQCs). In this work, we identify this effect as measurement-induced logit contraction, a previously uncharacterized source of trainability degradation in hybrid QNNs. To address this limitation, we introduce a learnable scaling parameter, termed Quantum Measurement Temperature (QMT), which rescales quantum measurement outputs prior to the loss. Unlike post-hoc calibration, QMT acts during training and compensates for the physically imposed bounds on quantum measurement outputs. This rescaling increases gradient magnitude and variance, thereby improving loss sensitivity. The proposed mechanism is architecture-agnostic and does not modify the quantum ansatz, circuit depth, or measurement operators. Experiments on fluorescence microscopy images and a six-class variant of Fashion MNIST demonstrate that QMT consistently enhances logit separation, strengthens gradients, stabilizes training across random initializations, and improves classification accuracy, relative to unscaled measurement readouts. These results demonstrate that QMT enables stable and reliable training of hybrid QNNs for practical applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
- 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
- 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
- 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 216
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 193
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2019Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentationcited by 163
11 more
- 2020Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 125
- 2020Entanglement Induced Barren Plateauscited by 101
- 2020Layerwise learning for quantum neural networkscited by 88
- 2018Towards Quantum Machine Learning with Tensor Networkscited by 76
- 2020Trainability of Dissipative Perceptron-Based Quantum Neural Networkscited by 56
- 2021Subtleties in the trainability of quantum machine learning modelscited by 33
- 2022Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Robust Calibration of Deep Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2023Training robust and generalizable quantum modelscited by 21
- 2021Quantum Self-Supervised Learningcited by 20
- 2023Tensor networks for quantum machine learningcited by 17
- 2025Practical insights on the effect of different encodings, ans"atze and measurements in quantum and hybrid convolutional neural networkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.