mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

All Green, Still Broken: Real-Flow Verification Lessons from an LLM-Integrated, Multi-Market Web Application

arXiv 2606.22475 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern web applications increasingly combine three ingredients that are hard to test: output from large language models, multi-market internationalization, and browser-driven front-ends over external data sources. We report on a production rental-search assistant whose automated suite grew to 1,553 test cases in six weeks. The suite passed continuously, yet user-facing defects continued to reach production. We studied all 252 bug-fix commits in the project and classified each by the boundary, or seam, it escaped through. About 44 percent of the fixes fall in four seams that component-level unit tests cannot observe: the live browser runtime, the non-default market, the end-to-end flow, and the whole-system level. A fix without a guard at the seam let one defect ship twice. We present the four-seam framework, the measured defect distribution, and the practices we adopted, including a simple way for a team to find the seam that carries the most fixes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2026.

Builds on

5 of 13 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2024BugsInPy: A Database of Existing Bugs in Python Programs to Enable Controlled Testing and Debugging Studiescited by 36
  3. 2024An Empirical Study on Challenges for LLM Application Developerscited by 18
  4. 2025Assessing and Advancing Benchmarks for Evaluating Large Language Models in Software Engineering Taskscited by 17
  5. 2025Tracking the Moving Target: A Framework for Continuous Evaluation of LLM Test Generation in Industrycited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.