mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data Pruning: Redundant, Problematic, and Interdependent Samples

arXiv 2606.21916 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of deep learning models is affected by not only data quantity but also data quality. Data pruning is a process by which practitioners can reduce the size of a dataset by only keeping the most important training data points, thereby achieving similar test set performance. We empirically investigate two popular data pruning methods under noisy and noiseless conditions and show that these methods fail in the presence of significant label noise. We highlight that the success of data pruning is distinctly affected by three factors: redundancy in the dataset, the presence of problematic samples, and interdependence between samples. We perform a detailed investigation on commonly used benchmark classification datasets and neural network architectures. We find that our observations are consistent across data distributions and training protocols.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 25 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  5. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  6. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  8. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  9. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  10. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  11. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  12. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
8 more
  1. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  2. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  3. 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
  4. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  5. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 165
  6. 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
  7. 2020Characterizing Structural Regularities of Labeled Data in Overparameterized Modelscited by 93
  8. 2023Data Valuation Without Training of a Modelcited by 35

Built on by

Not cited yet.