mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Clinical Term Extraction using Open-Source Small Language Models

arXiv 2606.21689 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical information for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) care documented in unstructured clinical notes limits downstream analysis without extraction into structured formats. Open-source small language models with few-shot prompting for detecting the presence of ALS-relevant clinical terms in patient documentation were evaluated without task-specific training data. The detection task targeted 17 categories spanning functional scores, respiratory measures, medications, and related clinical and non-clinical attributes. Clinical note content was normalized from JSON-encoded discharge summaries and processed with a prompt template having structured JSON outputs. We compared 26 open-source models using aggregate, label-level, and manual-validation multilabel classification metrics. Manual validation showed that a regex rule baseline had higher overall micro-F1 and lower Hamming loss than any single SLM or TF-IDF baseline, while Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 was the highest-performing SLM by micro-F1. Model rankings varied by metric and label category, with the TF-IDF baseline showing high recall but low precision, some SLMs showing higher precision but lower recall, and Hammer2.1-7b showing strong performance for ALSFRS-R subscore detection. These findings support targeted hybrid extraction workflows rather than replacement of existing rule-based methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

2 of 9 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947

Built on by

Not cited yet.