mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DIPBox: A Multi-scale Testing Framework for Tracking Dataset Regeneration

arXiv 2606.21240 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training datasets have tremendous proprietary value and are vulnerable to unauthorized copying. Existing defenses mainly focus on tracking individual data points, but pay little attention to the threat of dataset regeneration. Through a measurement study of public tumor datasets, we identify substantial real-world partial-dataset replication, raising concerns about potential license noncompliance. To counter the challenge of tracking previously unknown adversarial regeneration, our key insight is that regeneration that preserves model utility inevitably preserves measurable signals across multiple feature scales. We categorize these dataset features into sample-, set-, and distribution-level features and design four similarity metrics to accurately identify regeneration. Based on these metrics, we develop DIPBox, which to our knowledge is the first testing framework that tracks regeneration suspects via multi-scale similarity testing across a spectrum of defender access settings, from limited to full information. We further provide a learning-theoretic analysis that justifies these multi-scale metrics and formalizes an inherent utility--divergence trade-off, implying fundamental limits on evasive regeneration. Extensive experiments on 16 vision and text base datasets, 320 regenerated datasets, and 590 derived models validate that DIPBox outperforms previous solutions while characterizing its robustness and limits under three adaptive attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

33 of 72 references.

References · 33

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  6. 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,293
  7. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,186
  8. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,184
  9. 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
  10. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  11. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
  12. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 960
21 more
  1. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  2. 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
  3. 2019Well-Read Students Learn Better: On the Importance of Pre-training Compact Modelscited by 120
  4. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  5. 2024LLM Dataset Inference: Did you train on my dataset?cited by 110
  6. 2022FedPrompt: Communication-Efficient and Privacy Preserving Prompt Tuning in Federated Learningcited by 91
  7. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
  8. 2020DP-MERF: Differentially Private Mean Embeddings with Random Features for Practical Privacy-Preserving Data Generationcited by 78
  9. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 69
  10. 2021Generalization in NLI: Ways (Not) To Go Beyond Simple Heuristicscited by 67
  11. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
  12. 2015Deep Neural Networks with Random Gaussian Weights: A Universal Classification Strategy?cited by 41
  13. 2022Private Set Generation with Discriminative Informationcited by 34
  14. 2024Do Generated Data Always Help Contrastive Learning?cited by 25
  15. 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscationcited by 20
  16. 2023Towards more Practical Threat Models in Artificial Intelligence Securitycited by 17
  17. 2024A General Framework for Data-Use Auditing of ML Modelscited by 16
  18. 2019Read, Attend and Comment: A Deep Architecture for Automatic News Comment Generationcited by 12
  19. 2022Learning from Randomly Initialized Neural Network Featurescited by 12
  20. 2022On the Effectiveness of Dataset Watermarking in Adversarial Settingscited by 12
  21. 2022PublicCheck: Public Integrity Verification for Services of Run-time Deep Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.