mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Hooking Onto the World: Referential Profiles and the Numerical Structure of LLM Grounding

arXiv 2606.21195 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper revisits the grounding problem for large language models in light of recent vector-grounding accounts. I accept the shift from classical symbol grounding to vector grounding, but argue that the current debate remains incomplete in two respects. First, reference is often treated too thinly, as if it were a fixed link between an isolated expression and an object. I argue instead that reference is profile-based, context-sensitive, discourse-level, affectively shaped, and norm-governed. Even in the human case, reference is publicly stabilized through patterns of use, correction, distinction, inference, and continuation rather than through identical private representations. Second, vector grounding requires an account of numerical realization. LLMs do not acquire reference through human perception, memory, intention, embodiment, or understanding. Rather, through optimization, they parameterize linguistic traces of human world-directed practice. In a finite vector system, referential profiles must be distributed, may be superposed, and are recovered through context-sensitive computation. Weights, activations, attention-mediated hidden states, softmax-trained contrasts, and inner-product alignments are the mathematical sites at which inherited linguistic relations become stable and causally active. Mechanistic interpretability findings, including entity-like features, knowledge neurons, and emotion-related activation directions, provide indirect support for this view. They do not show that LLMs possess human reference. They support a more limited thesis: LLMs may possess derivative, language-mediated, profile-based, and numerically structured forms of reference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

3 of 14 references.

References · 3

  1. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  2. 2026Emotion Concepts and their Function in a Large Language Modelcited by 57
  3. 2023The Vector Grounding Problemcited by 39

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Grounding Gap: How LLMs Anchor the Meaning of Abstract Concepts Differently from Humans
  2. 2025The Mechanistic Emergence of Symbol Grounding in Language Models
  3. 2024"Understanding AI": Semantic Grounding in Large Language Models
  4. 2023Grounding Gaps in Language Model Generations
  5. 2026Beyond Surface Alignment: Grounding the Dynamics of Situational Understanding and Generative Control in LLMs
  6. 2025GroundingME: Exposing the Visual Grounding Gap in MLLMs through Multi-Dimensional Evaluation
  7. 2025Measuring How (Not Just Whether) VLMs Build Common Ground
  8. 2025Evaluating Large Language Models on the Frame and Symbol Grounding Problems: A Zero-shot Benchmark